El hombre mas inteligente es αlвєrt єínѕtєín
Answer for the second
'Released from foreign war, we would probably be plunged into all the misery of anarchy and intestine war. Can we suppose that the people of the south, would submit to having the seat of Empire at Philadelphia, or New England; or that the people oppressed by a change of government, contrasting their misery with their former happy state, would not invite Britain to reassume the sovereignty.” — James Chalmers, Plain Truth, 1776
If the one above is the argument, you might consider that the colonists did obtain independence from England. That by itself was something that Chalmers always thought to be impossible without serious repercussions. He used to say that in the case of achieving freedom, America would just end up being attacked and maybe even colonized by some other country. What happened, thought, was that after the revolution, other countries gained respect for America as an opponent and the country was eventually left to be.
Down the great rivers that flow into the Baltic Sea. Then the sailors would portage (carry and drag) their ships between rivers, heading for southern flowing rivers, such as the Dneiper and Don,
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
The British imperial policies between 1763 and 1776 centers around the need of the Great Britain to pay off the debts acquired during the French and Indian war.
This led to Great Britain to impose various acts and taxations on the colonists, such as Sugar Acts, Stamp Acts, Currency Acts, Tea Acts amongst others.
However, this new strict enforcement of policies of Great Britain led to intensified colonials' resistance to British rule and their commitment to republican values.
