1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aliya0001 [1]
3 years ago
5

World war i has often been described as an unnecessary war. do you agree? why or why not

History
1 answer:
Ne4ueva [31]3 years ago
8 0
The question is based on your own opinion,I cannot give you direct answer,but here's some idea for you.

yes: the war was caused by extreme nationalism,where the nations had the desire to be strong with and they seek for national glory. It started with this concept,they began to ally,to expand,soon running into conflicts,eventually the scale enlarged to a world war. Yet the chase for national glory was originally to bring a better nation,in the end it just cause loss and destruction. War is not necessary to be started in orfer to gain national glory. Were the nations to back down,it could be avoided. You might want to expand more on the destruction it caused if you choose yes.

No: In spite of WWI did cause a lot of destruction,it pushes the history of human foward. You could talk more on the things achieved and changed in WWI,such as the fall of empires,the uprise of women rights,the establishment of national cooperation system(League of nations), and the develope of more destructive weapons.

hope it helps!
You might be interested in
Why do you think the British would use a physical<br>characteristic to set a boundary?​
Zinaida [17]

Answer:

To seclude and divide from another country or area.

Explanation:

Rivers, mountain ranges, oceans, and deserts can all serve as physical boundaries. Many times, political boundaries between countries or states form along physical boundaries. For example, the boundary between France and Spain follows the peaks of the Pyrenees Mountains, while the Alps separate France from Italy.

4 0
3 years ago
What was an effect of the 1978 Iranian revolution A: Iran moved its capital city. B: Iran became an Islamic republic C: a shah t
Nana76 [90]

Answer:

It is B.

Explanation:

All the other options don't make sense.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Someone help me por favorrrrr :(
rusak2 [61]
If u don't need help don't ask it on brainley it is for school work only
8 0
3 years ago
How did southern states react tolthe news of Abraham Lincoln winning the Election of
Lostsunrise [7]

Answer:

For the most part, states in the South reacted with anger to Lincoln's victory in the election of 1860.  

The major issue of the 1860 presidential election was slavery.  For Southerners, expanding slavery was the critical issue.  Slavery was so pressing that the Democratic party put forth two candidates.  One of them represented the Northern Democrats and the other candidate was for the interests of the Southern Democrats.  Southerners knew that Lincoln and the newly formed Republican party were not going to be friendly to the expansion of slavery in the nation.  

The high voter turnout reflected the voting public's passionate intensity regarding slavery.  Lincoln did not win any electoral votes in the South, but carried the electoral votes in the Northern states.  This helped to enhance the sectionalist feel to the election. Sectionalist feelings became more pronounced with Lincoln's election. Southerners openly embraced secession, or separating from the nation.  South Carolina was the first state to secede upon Lincoln's election, proclaiming "that the Union now subsisting between South Carolina and other states under the name of the 'United States of America' is hereby dissolved" with Lincoln's election in the Presidential Election of 1860.  

There were many reasons as to why Southern states separated from the nation.  Talk of secession was becoming more evident as the partisanship for and against slavery became more entrenched.  For Southern states, the election of Lincoln, though, became seen as a "last straw" and something that showed that compromise on slavery between North and South was impossible to achieve.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
I NEED HELP NOW ASAP
worty [1.4K]
Not paying attention is the meaning for that fr fr
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Mark all that apply. The Indus Valley civilization was known for its _____.
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements is true? The Charter of the United Nations created an international organization devoted to pr
    8·1 answer
  • What did Harappan workers create that was unknown to other cultures
    6·1 answer
  • What's a good sentence for triangle trade
    11·1 answer
  • How did the Maurya and Gupta Empires compare in size?
    14·1 answer
  • De que maneira esses ideais defendidos pelo Iluminismo provocaram os governos da época? Explique.
    5·1 answer
  • George H.W. Bush ______.
    7·2 answers
  • The nullification crisis that occurred between president andrew jackson and john calhoun would best be described as a debate ove
    6·2 answers
  • Most of Europe's early cities developed near...​
    6·1 answer
  • Which country owned Alaska before it became U.S territory
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!