<span>Diversity of Native American Groups. The structures Native Americans called homewere extremely varied and often exclusive to tribe or region. ... There are certain experiences common to the survivors of these tribes. They all have had their lands compromised in some way and suffered the horrors of reservation life.</span>
Answer:
I feel like he was not condoning a riot but say that riots will happen if the problem is not solved like what’s happening now. America has failed to hear the voices of Mexicans, who have built this country up, voices of black people, who are racially profiled as criminals and killed wrongly, voices of indigenous, who they stole land from, Asians, who did not creat corona, and lgbtq+, who do not choose who they love.
Explanation:
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
the women's Latino and native American movements all made a huge impact on the history of the United States of America. first and foremost the woman's movement established the right for women to vote and established independency. the Latino movement established the right to be treated equally in the United States of America by providing them with easy access to healthcare education and housing. the native American movement also established their right to independently have their own reservations which includes land businesses and last but not least and sovereign government. native Americans had the biggest impact on the United States of America by simply enduring the emotional and physical pain of their land been occupied by outsiders. the native American movement has been the oldest movement in the United States of America which established them the most important group of people in the United States history
Scarcity is the fundamental challenge that all individuals and nations must confront. Everyone faces some limitations, so we all have to make choices where we limit or allow ourselves to something.
Economists generally recognize four types of economic systems traditional, traditional, command, market and mixed.
A traditional economic system is shaped by tradition. The work that people do, the goods and services they provide, how they exchange resources… all tend to follow a pattern. The traditional system is bad at addressing scarcity because scarcity is formed off of new requirements people have through the ages and a traditional system would not evolve just as our requirements would.
In a planned economy, the government controls the economy. The state decides how to use and distribute resources. The government regulates prices and wages; it may even determine what sorts of work individuals do.
Socialism is a prime example of a planned economy. Socialism does not work because it is not consistent with the fundamental principles of human behavior. The failure of socialism in countries around the world can be traced to one critical defect: it is a system that ignores incentives.
Market economies allow all economic decisions to be made by individuals. The unrestrained interactions between individuals and companies in the marketplace determine what happens to all the good and resources.Individuals choose how to invest their personal resources and individuals decide what to consume. Within a pure market economy, the government is entirely absent from economic affairs.
A mixed economic system combines elements of the market and command economy. Many economic decisions are made in the market by individuals. But the government also plays a role in the allocation and distribution of resources.
If scarcity is looked at on a macro level, the best economic system is mixed because it allows the government to also plays a role in the allocation and distribution of resources, while the individuals still stay happy because they have some control. The only problem is the eternal question of what the right mix between the public and private sectors of the economy should be.
There is no point to look at it on a micro level because almost no country is small enough to be considered on that level.
