Answer: <u>Bilingual people, bilingual advantage</u>
Explanation:
Bilingual people are those individual who have ability to speak two languages with fluency.They can communicate in two languages which they might have learned or is natively present in them.
Bilingual advantage is the benefits received by a person who speaks two different languages.They develop learning and communicating ability more as compared with single-language speaking person.It also provides more number of opportunities, perspective and attention to the individual.
Answer:
True!
Explanation:
During the Second World War (1939–1945), India was a part of the British Empire, with the British holding territories in India that included over six hundred autonomous Princely States. British India officially declared war on Nazi Germany in September 1939.[1] The British Raj, as part of the Allied Nations, sent over two and a half million soldiers to fight under British command against the Axis powers. India also provided the base for American operations in support of China in the China Burma India Theater.
Indians fought with distinction throughout the world, including in the European theatre against Germany, in North Africa against Germany and Italy, in the South Asian region defending India against the Japanese and fighting the Japanese in Burma. Indians also aided in liberating British colonies such as Singapore and Hong Kong after the Japanese surrender in August 1945. Over 87,000 Indian soldiers (including those from modern day Pakistan, and Bangladesh) and 3 million civilians died in World War II.[2][3] Field Marshal Sir Claude Auchinleck, Commander-in-Chief, India, stated the British "couldn't have come through both wars [World War I and II] if they hadn't had the Indian Army."[4][5]
Viceroy Linlithgow declared that India was at war with Germany without consultations with Indian politicians.[6] Political parties such as the Muslim League and the Hindu Mahasabha supported the British war effort while the largest and most influential political party existing in India at the time, the Indian National Congress, demanded independence before it would help Britain.[7][8] London refused, and when Congress announced a "Quit India" campaign in August 1942, tens of thousands of its leaders were imprisoned by the British for the duration. Meanwhile, under the leadership of Indian leader Subhash Chandra Bose, Japan set up an army of Indian POWs known as the Indian National Army, which fought against the British. A major famine in Bengal in 1943 led to 3 million deaths due to starvation, and a highly controversial issue remains regarding Churchill's decision to not provide emergency food relief.[9][10]
Indian participation in the Allied campaign remained strong. The financial, industrial and military assistance of India formed a crucial component of the British campaign against Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan.[11] India's strategic location at the tip of the Indian Ocean, its large production of armaments, and its huge armed forces played a decisive role in halting the progress of Imperial Japan in the South-East Asian theatre.[12] The Indian Army during World War II was one of the largest Allied forces contingents which took part in the North and East African Campaign, Western Desert Campaign. At the height of the second World War, more than 2.5 million Indian troops were fighting Axis forces around the globe.[13] After the end of the war, India emerged as the world's fourth largest industrial power and its increased political, economic and military influence paved the way for its independence from the United Kingdom in 1947.[14]
Answer: The confidence interval would be (82198.71, 103801.28).
Explanation:
Since we have given that
Mean = $93,000
Standard deviation = $17,000
n = 12 < 30
So, we will use 't-test' to find the 95% confidence interval,
Here , 
and 
So, according to t table, we get that
So, interval would be
Hence, the confidence interval would be (82198.71, 103801.28).
Answer:
Utilitarian
Explanation:
The approach Gina is using in this ethical dilemma is known as Utilitarian approach.
Utilitarianism satisfies the fact that the most ethical choice produces the greatest good for larger number. This ethical theory reveals the right from the wrong by solely focusing on the outcome. It's concern is the consequences of ethical decisions.
Therefore, since Gina is suggesting for a sidestepping of the rules which will result to a greater good than following procedures, Gina is taking the utilitarian approach.
Answer:
I belive its b sorry if I'm wrong
