1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ganezh [65]
3 years ago
11

In the listeners what does the the man do when he releases that no one is going to answer?

English
1 answer:
guajiro [1.7K]3 years ago
5 0

In the poem "The Listener" by Walter de la Mare, when the man realizes that no one is going to answer, he decides to walk to a neighbour's house. It is important to consider that the theme of the poem is to reflect the fact that the men is small compared with the whole universe.

You might be interested in
What do you see? what is happening? why?<br>​
bearhunter [10]
I see a child on the counter while a women is taking a photo in the background. The child is then looking back at this lady who is not paying attention to the kid.
5 0
3 years ago
Communication is the process of transmitting information from one person or place to another.
mrs_skeptik [129]
The answer is true.that is the meaning of communication
8 0
3 years ago
Which statement is an opinion supported by a fact? Georgia O'Keeffe was an American painter who famously painted desert landscap
Lerok [7]

Answer:

C). Georgia O'Keeffe was a great artist, and she was inducted into the American Academy of Arts and Letters in 1962.

Explanation:

An opinion is characterized as 'a subjective belief, judgment, or perspective that an individual has formed about a specific topic, issue, person, or thing' while a fact is described as 'an objective consensus on a fundamental reality that has been agreed upon by a substantial number of experts.' An opinion may or may not be true and requires sufficient evidence or facts to establish it while a fact is an ultimate reality.

As per the question, the third statement correctly displays an opinion that is backed by a fact. It <u>shows the common belief of people that Keefe had been a wonderful artist which is supported by the factual evidence of 'her induction into Arts and Letters Academy in the year 1962' which validates the truth of the opinion</u>. Thus, <u>option C</u> is the correct answer.

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I can’t remember the last time I got a good night’s sleep. I keep waking up because I’m so stressed about my math class. I just
Fed [463]
1. Not sleeping
2. His brain cant function properly due to him being tired
3. Get some sleep or get a schedule to efficiently practice mathematics
Pls mark as brainliest
3 0
2 years ago
What was the main flaw in the sepreme courts reasoning in Plessy v. Ferguson
devlian [24]
N Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), the Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of a Louisiana law passed in 1890 "providing for separate railway carriages for the white and colored races." The law, which required that all passenger railways provide separate cars for blacks and whites, stipulated that the cars be equal in facilities, banned whites from sitting in black cars and blacks in white cars (with exception to "nurses attending children of the other race"), and penalized passengers or railway employees for violating its terms. 

<span>Homer Plessy, the plaintiff in the case, was seven-eighths white and one-eighth black, and had the appearance of a white man. On June 7, 1892, he purchased a first-class ticket for a trip between New Orleans and Covington, La., and took possession of a vacant seat in a white-only car. Duly arrested and imprisoned, Plessy was brought to trial in a New Orleans court and convicted of violating the 1890 law. He then filed a petition against the judge in that trial, Hon. John H. Ferguson, at the Louisiana Supreme Court, arguing that the segregation law violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which forbids states from denying "to any person within their jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws," as well as the Thirteenth Amendment, which banned slavery. </span>

<span>The Court ruled that, while the object of the Fourteenth Amendment was to create "absolute equality of the two races before the law," such equality extended only so far as political and civil rights (e.g., voting and serving on juries), not "social rights" (e.g., sitting in a railway car one chooses). As Justice Henry Brown's opinion put it, "if one race be inferior to the other socially, the constitution of the United States cannot put them upon the same plane." Furthermore, the Court held that the Thirteenth Amendment applied only to the imposition of slavery itself. </span>

<span>The Court expressly rejected Plessy's arguments that the law stigmatized blacks "with a badge of inferiority," pointing out that both blacks and whites were given equal facilities under the law and were equally punished for violating the law. "We consider the underlying fallacy of [Plessy's] argument" contended the Court, "to consist in the assumption that the enforced separation of the two races stamps the colored race with a badge of inferiority. If this be so, it is not by reason of anything found in the act, but solely because the colored race chooses to put that construction upon it." </span>

<span>Justice John Marshall Harlan entered a powerful -- and lone -- dissent, noting that "in view of the Constitution, in the eye of the law, there is in this country no superior, dominant, ruling class of citizens. There is no caste here. Our Constitution is color-blind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens." </span>

<span>Until the mid-twentieth century, Plessy v. Ferguson gave a "constitutional nod" to racial segregation in public places, foreclosing legal challenges against increasingly-segregated institutions throughout the South. The railcars in Plessy notwithstanding, the black facilities in these institutions were decidedly inferior to white ones, creating a kind of racial caste society. However, in the landmark decision Brown v. Board of Education (1954), the "separate but equal" doctrine was abruptly overturned when a unanimous Supreme Court ruled that segregating children by race in public schools was "inherently unequal" and violated the Fourteenth Amendment. Brown provided a major catalyst for the civil rights movement (1955-68), which won social, not just political and civil, racial equality before the law. After four decades, Justice Harlan's dissent became the law of the land. Following Brown, the Supreme Court has consistently ruled racial segregation in public settings to be unconstitutional. </span>
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Capulet: Why, how now, kinsman! wherefore storm you so?
    6·2 answers
  • Why was the Constitutional Convention necessary?
    10·2 answers
  • Our newspaper is delivered daily.<br><br> Time<br> Place<br> or Manner
    12·1 answer
  • Fill in the blank
    8·1 answer
  • Can you match these??
    10·1 answer
  • Summary of act 2 of the tragedy of Macbeth
    7·1 answer
  • The spending of the EU is closely monitored by what organization?
    5·1 answer
  • Why did the government try to protect and conserve the redwood forest<br>​
    12·2 answers
  • Y am i scared to talk to other girls?
    5·2 answers
  • Drag the tiles to the correct boxes to complete the pairs
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!