1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
LiRa [457]
3 years ago
11

The great economic and social divisions between the North and South in the first half of the 1800s eventually led to the Civil W

ar. During those prewar years, the North industrialized, urbanized, and became more reliant on wage labor. In contrast, the South remained a rural, agricultural society that focused on slavery to harvest cash crops like cotton and tobacco. Historians have often said that due to the huge differences between the two regions, the Civil War was inevitable. What do you think could have been done, if anything, to prevent the war? Also consider the issue of slavery, which became so central to the disagreements between the North and South. Could simple compromise or political debate between the two sides have eventually ended slavery without a war? Be sure to point to evidence from throughout this unit or that you have found on your own that supports your viewpoint.
History
1 answer:
just olya [345]3 years ago
4 0
To be frank, civil war is inevitable. Even a compromise or a debate could not prevent of such of happening.  During the election of that time between Abraham Lincoln and his rival Seward during the 1860 election and McClellan there are already debates at that time and speeches but it didn't prevent the civil war. Also in economic side if the South would give in to the North wants to abolished slavery it would downturn their business in a long run, a thing that a business should avoid at all cost. 
You might be interested in
Which empire was conquered by Hernan Cortés? A. Aztec B. Maya C. Olmec D. Inca
madam [21]
Hernan Cortes was a Spanish Conquistador who led an expedition that conquered the Aztec Empire and imperialized large parts of Mexico. Cortes conquered modern day Mexico on behalf of the Spanish kingdom of King of Castille in the 16th century. Cortes was a part of the early colonizers from the Spain who conquered and colonized large swaths of the Americas. The Spanish conquered enormous swaths of Latin and South America and the effects of this colonization can still be seen in the language, culture, and lifestyle of this region. 

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who was the leader of the Safavid Dynasty? Suleiman Abbas I Babur Akbar
Vedmedyk [2.9K]

Answer:

Shah Abbas

Explanation:

The Safavid empire was known as an empire in modern day Iran. They were known for their gunpowder profound establishment and acceptance of the Shia Islam as their major religion in the empire.

Shah Abbas was the fifth ruler of the empire was also known as Abbas I of Persia. He came into power when the empire were experiencing a very hard and chaotic time. He however stabilized the empire, reformed the military and brought in a considerable amount of economic growth.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were two purposes of the Sugar Act passed by the British Parliament in 1764?
Agata [3.3K]

Answer:

Option "A" and "B" is the correct answer to the following question.

Explanation:

In United states colonial past, the Sugar Act, also known as the Cultivation Act or Revenue Act, was British laws and regulations seeking to end the illegal trade of sugar and molasses from either the French and Dutch Indies and increasing revenues to fund expanded British Empire understand the importance of communication the French and Indian Wars.

7 0
2 years ago
Help Me!! I’ll give you a bunch of points and brainliest if it’s right!
erik [133]

Answer:

the answer I think is C

Explanation:

so I hope that this is correct

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Nationalism can be fostered by..
oksian1 [2.3K]

Answer:

<h2>Brainiest me</h2>

Explanation:

The debate has been lively since the Scots voted 55 percent to 45 percent against dissolving their 307-year-old union with England. Some commentators have pointed to the strong showing of the Scottish separatists as another manifestation, different but nonetheless alarming, of a revival of nationalism across Europe that has spawned populist and anti-European Union, anti-immigration parties like the United Kingdom Independence Party or the National Front in France. Yet the Scots, like the Ukrainians, or the Catalans, are in many ways the opposite of the anti-E.U. forces. Many of their activists were inspired by the example of a country like Slovakia, which broke away from a larger state but now enjoys the free-trade benefits of the European Union and membership in NATO.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Dust Bowl era emphasized the importance of _______ to Oklahoma’s economy.
    11·2 answers
  • 1 Point
    14·1 answer
  • How did World War II iſ affect the economy ?
    13·2 answers
  • What were the factors that drew settlers west during the first half of the 19th century
    14·1 answer
  • How did china limit the impact of foreing trade on their country
    15·1 answer
  • Why did much of the colonial population support independence by late 1776?
    11·1 answer
  • Spending money on public works, such as transportation and infrastructure, will accomplish which of the following?
    13·2 answers
  • Was Thomas Jefferson a successful leader for our nation?
    7·2 answers
  • What reflects an idea contained in the United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights?
    11·1 answer
  • Why were slaves branded when they reached the African coast?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!