1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tia_tia [17]
3 years ago
12

The Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. Arizona that _____.

History
2 answers:
alina1380 [7]3 years ago
8 0

<em><u>The Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. Arizona that police must inform suspects of their rights before questioning. </u></em>

Further Explanations:

Ruling of the Miranda versus Arizona stated that the detained suspect must be informed about their constitutional rights before they are being questioned or arrested. As per the ruling,the 5th Amendment act prevents prosecutors from using suspect’sstatement made at the time of interrogation or in custody. It is their legal right to refer an attorney afore being questioned.

Miranda's case was regarded as a radical change in the American Criminal law as it changed the extended the significance of the Fifth Amendment. As earlier, it was expected that the act protects the citizens against compulsion to confess and contempt of court but after the ruling, it also added that the act informs citizens about their rights. The ruling led to a significant impact of the America’s Law enforcement that also became the routine procedure of police. This procedure was also called Miranda warning that was the oral notifications give to the arrested person in the custody.

Learn more

1. The impact of Furman v. Georgia (1972) was that states had to promise to use the death penalty only with approval from the Supreme Court. Throw out the old Miranda warning and write a new one. Agree to throw out all state laws regarding crime and impose national standards. Create clear Miranda to be applied Georgia before imposing the death penalty?<u>brainly.com/question/637963 </u>

2. What was the charge of the 1807 indictment by the man who was chosen as vice president on February 17, 1801, by the House of Representatives after thirty-six ballots? <u>brainly.com/question/8775340 </u>

3. How did henry ford’s model t contribute to the culture of the roaring twenties? <u>brainly.com/question/7802830 </u>

<u> </u>

Answer Details  

Grade: High School

Subject: History

Chapter: Miranda versus Arizona

Keywords: Miranda versus Arizona,Miranda versus Arizona, the 5th Amendment, suspect’s statement, interrogation, custody, legal right, American Criminal law, Fifth Amendment, Law enforcement, Miranda warning,custody

Basile [38]3 years ago
6 0

The answer is: that evidence seized illegally cannot be used in a criminal trial.

<em>The Miranda rights</em> (  also known as Miranda warning ) is an oral notification given to a person in police custody. That person is usually accused of committing a crime or criminal offence.

The accused is given the right to remain silent, meaning they can refuse to answer any questions or give information to law enforcement officials. They also have the right to have an attorney present during their interrogation. If they can not afford one, <em>the court will appoint an attorney for them. </em>

The Miranda warning is only given if the individual in question is about to be interrogated, and not if arrested only.

This warning was established as part of the Fifth Amendment right against  self incrimination. Any evidence obtained from an accused person without them being given the Miranda rights can not be used as evidence in court.

Miranda v. Arizona was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in 1966. It ruled that statements made by the defendant in an interrogation would only be admissible at trial if the individual was aware of his rights ( silence, attorney ), and that the individual understood the rights and voluntarily agreed to them.



You might be interested in
The Fundamental Orders of Connecticut was the first written constitution in America. T or F.
masha68 [24]
Yes thats its true i would rather say the fundamental orders is a also in the goverment place too.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Where were a number of Anton Chekov's plays produced?
Marizza181 [45]

In 1894, Chekhov began writing his play The Seagull in a lodge he had built in the orchard at Melikhovo.

Hope that helps some.

3 0
3 years ago
How were chief black hawk and osceola,and what did they have in common
timurjin [86]
Hi lol<span> My Anser is .........................</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Which political leader supported nullification, the idea that each state could decide which federal laws to obey?
igomit [66]
<span>The correct answer is B. John C. Calhoun of South Carolina. Basically, he believed in nullification becasue he supported slavery, believing it was actually good. He claimed that states shuold have the right to have slaves even if the entire country and the federational government said that they shouldn't. He said that it was a minority right and that each individual state should be observed as a minority.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did spain lose power
labwork [276]

Answer:

"Gold and silver from her massive American empire fueled Spanish dreams to wrest control of Italy and the Netherlands from France, and to spread Catholicism all across the world. And yet, 300 years later, the Treaty of Paris ended the Spanish-American War, and with it, the Spanish colonial empire died."

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What motivates leaders in cuba, china, and north korea to prevent their citizens from freely accessing the internet?
    10·2 answers
  • describe the events leading up to the battle at Valmy, the outcome of the battle, and the battle’s importance
    6·1 answer
  • Sometimes, people appear before a committee to provide more information related to a bill. What is this called?
    7·2 answers
  • Which statements describing aspects of Russia's culture and history are true? Choose all answers that are correct. A. Russia is
    7·1 answer
  • PART B: Which line from the letter best supports the answer to Part A?
    8·1 answer
  • Bju american republic 8th answers
    8·1 answer
  • How did Roosevelt’s diplomatic policies contradict each other?
    6·2 answers
  • May I please have help with this​
    13·1 answer
  • Choose the 2 things that made 1968 significant
    13·1 answer
  • What did Sirajuddaulah ask the British to do to stop their intervention?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!