1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
hodyreva [135]
4 years ago
6

This Is Econ

History
2 answers:
anastassius [24]4 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Given an understanding of the Law of Demand in economics, and looking at the data provided by the graph, there are two possible answers here, both equally supported by the theory itself: An increase in price as quantity demand decreases, and an increase in quantity demanded as prices decrease. However, given that there is only one option, I would have to go with the last option as the best answer.

Both outcomes are equally supported by the graph shown here. The highest price for a product appears at the lowest possible quantity demand ($15.00 for a given product at the lowest quantity demand point, which would be near 0), and not just demand in general, but quantity of a product demanded, and the price starts to go down as the quantity demands goes higher. However, given that there is only one possible answer, I would go for the last one as the most accurate way to interpret the graph. What can definitely be concluded is that price level is inversely tied to quantity demanded of any given product.

Lelechka [254]4 years ago
6 0
An increase in price makes the demand higher.

As you can see by the graph, as the prices is lowered, the demand increases.

Hope this helped!
You might be interested in
Please help quickly
rosijanka [135]

Answer:

A.

Explanation:

Josef Stalin was the dictator who ruled the Soviet Union from 1927 to 1953. In his dictatorship, Stalin used harsh ways to rule the Soviet Union. Succeeding Lenin, Stalin Josef destroyed old political party during the Great Purge, also known as 'Great Terror.' Starting from killing political elites, the purge reached locals as well, who were suspected to be counter-revolutionary. Benito Mussolini was the fascist dictator of Italy from 1925 to 1945. He allied himself with Adolf Hitler to build up his leadership. Both Mussolini and Stalin used secret police force to silence their opposition.

Therefore, option A is correct.

7 0
3 years ago
"The majority, oppressing an individual, is guilty of a crime, abuses its strength, and by acting on the law of the strongest br
Mnenie [13.5K]
<span>The rule of law is an essential principle in the nation but not nearly as important as the idea of majority rule. The rule of law is the most important principle in the nation where votes of the majority determine the laws. The rule of the majority with protection for the minority's rights is essential for preserving the liberties of all. The rule of the majority is the only principle on which this nation should run in order to protect democracy.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
The World War II military action is significant how
sergiy2304 [10]
The significance of military action in WWII is that without taking this necessary action, (assuming you are referring to the U.S.) WWII could have had a very different outcome. The U.S. involvement in WWII was the cause of the bombing of Pearl Harbor. If they hadn't formed the Allied Forces to defeat Germany and Hitler, Germany very well might have won.
6 0
4 years ago
Mehmet II allowed Jews and Christians to worship in Constantinople without persecution? A. True B. False
Alika [10]

Answer:

imma say true

Explanation:

sorry if wrong

8 0
3 years ago
Any adult in your life will remember the OJ Simpson trial. It was televised on national tv and everyone followed it closely.
ss7ja [257]

Answer:

Along with the fact that OJ was convicted for the murder of his wife, he was very famous and looked up to by many at the time. The case was followed on television and spoken about so widely in the news due to his status and the extremity of the crime he was accused of. The true question of whether murder trials should be in the media and on national TV is a very subjective matter. I believe in this case, entertainment of the people was chosen over privacy and proffesionality.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The election of 2008 was historically significant for women because
    10·1 answer
  • Congress has primary responsibility for making and controlling what
    14·1 answer
  • What’s New About New Zealand?
    7·1 answer
  • Members called the majority whip and the minority whip assist the majority snd minority party leaders on both houses. What is th
    11·1 answer
  • The historian Procopius attributes this speech to Theodora. She supposedly said it to Justinian when he wanted to flee from the
    13·1 answer
  • In the The French and Indian War why did Washington not like the French?
    15·2 answers
  • Why would the US congress pass such laws to return slaves who escaped back to their masters?
    10·1 answer
  • During the reign of Charles I, _________ was the state religion of Scotland.
    9·1 answer
  • In Baker v. Carr, the Supreme Court interpreted the equal protection clause to
    5·1 answer
  • Which statement tells what the American colonist of the British government during the later European wars of the 1700s
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!