<span>One motive of Germany sending the document was an effort to make an alliance with Mexico. They were agreeable to let Mexico retake their lost territory in states like Arizona, New Mexico and Texas. Germany decided to begin sinking other vessels without warning. He pushed for them to contact the president to alert him of what was happening.</span>
Hey there!
The ancient Greeks used direct democracy, and we use representative. The difference is that first of all, with a direct democracy, the opinions of the people directly affect the outcome of the decision being made. Those eligible to vote voted in assemblies, and the response of the majority ruled.
Here- it's a bit different. We use representative democracy- meaning that we elect representatives to vote and speak for us on the behalf of the people.
There's our difference right there. A direct democracy - like I said is where decisions directly affect outcomes, as opposed to where representatives are elected on behalf of the people to make laws and represent their voters and territory.
Your answer is C.
Hope this helps!
"Interaction" is the one understanding among the choices given in the question that audiences do <span>not gain from a soliloquy. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the first option or option "A". I hope that this is the answer that has come to your help.</span>
Answer:
popular support for the Union was strong in England.
Explanation:
Britain took a neutral stand during the civil war in the United States of America. Although a small British private interest supported Confederacy by supplying ammunition in exchange for cotton. But overall conditions signifies that Britain actually supported the Union efforts. The trade with Confederate states was declined by 90 percent. The hopes of British intervention by the Confederate remained a mere hope as Britain never recognized it as a nation nor it signed any treaty with it. Moreover, the British interest of trade was better supported by Unionism than by dividing it and the stakes for intervention were high.
Answer: Under the terms of this agreement, for example, the Senate as a whole may debate each amendment for no more than one hour. There is also a two-hour time limit for debate on the bill itself (that is, “general debate”).
Explanation:
