Analyzing the scenario, we see that the situation is repeated by the second. It may be that the first time, the woman did not know. But she had already been accused before, that is, that the second time, this was considered intentional and malicious conduct.
According to the penal code § 594, this act is considered vandalism, that is the defacing of another’s property with graffiti “or other inscribed material,” or damaging or destroying another’s property and this cant be done negligently, with the will to do the damage.
If she convicted of felony vandalism again, the maximum prison sentence is three years (after being convicted before) and fines can be up to $10,000. When the damage caused by the vandalism exceeds $10,000, the fines can be increased to $50,000. Then, comes the restitution (paying the owner property for the damage), and possibly community service.
I think it’s C because enslaved ppl are a primary source of information so they would be reliable.
Bernini used lots of extravagant <span>embellishments so A is not right.
</span><span>Güell Park does not have many murals so D is not right.
</span>
by elmination, ans should be B and C
Well, there can be three answers to this. Trade, migration, and expansion all played important roles in the spread of these things. When merchants traded, their cultures were spread, as they traded both products and information. Migration also played a role, since people migrated and then they adapted to the indigenous people's culture and the indigenous learned from them. Additionally, expansion played a role, because when people conquered other people, they forced them to accept their culture and eventually cultures mixed.
