I think it’s B. Don’t count on me th
Answer: Era of good feelings
Explanation:
The American colonists were justified in doing this simply because their colonies had become too big and too important to be treated as a colony by the British. The British should have given the colonies some autonomy, but they did not. The analogy I like to use is that of teens and their parents. Parents have to give teens more independence as they grow up. If they do not, the teens may justifiably rebel.
The British were not, on the whole, brutal or oppressive towards the colonists. However, they would not let the colonists have much in the way of self-rule. This had been fine when the colonies were still small and economically weak. By the 1760s and 1770s, however, the colonies were "teenagers." They were big and strong enough to expect some autonomy. When Britain reacted to requests for autonomy by being more strict, the colonists were justified in rebelling.
This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.
Read The Last Days of Innocence: America at War 1917–1918, by Harries and Harries (Random House, 1997)
According to harries and Harries, what were two reasons the espionage and sedition acts were passed?
Answer:
The Espionage Act (1917) and the Sedition Act (1918) were enacted to grant the government more reliable means to control the information related to the word effort. On one hand, there was the need to control what citizens said publicly about the war, to make sure that messages that incite disloyalty don´t spread.
Explanation:
At the same time, it was important to safeguard sensitive information about the war preparations, so the government being able of suppressing dangerous publications revealing secret details about the war.
