Answer:
So project two is better because it will increase the wealth of Chandler Tire by $ 18,598.33 more than Project 1
Explanation:
<em>To determine which project to be selected, we will compute the present value (PV) of the two projects and select the one with a higher PV.</em>
Present value is the today worth of the future cash inflows from a project. The higher the present value the more wealth is been created. So a project with a higher PV is better if two are been compared.
So when comparing two projects, the one with a higher PV is better.
<em>PV of Poject 1 </em>
PV = 52,000 × 1-(1.015)^(-6)
$196,793.10
<em>PV of Project 2</em>
PV = 48,000 × 1- (1.015)^(-8)
$215,391.43
So project two is better because it will increase the wealth of Chandler Tire by $ 18,598.33 more than Project 1
It will definitely decrease, as consumers will have to pay more and a deadweight loss will be present. Search up 'price floors and deadweight loss'.
the answer is b im not too sure tho
Answer:
$136
Explanation:
Date Transaction Units Cost Total
3 Purchase 5 $20 $100
10 Sale 3
17 Purchase 10 $24 $240
20 Sale 6
23 Sale 3
30 Purchase 10 $30 $300
using the first in, first out method, the COGS is calculated based on the oldest price of the units in merchandise inventory:
6 units were sold on May 20th, 2 of them costed $20 (May 3rd purchase) per unit = $40, while 4 of them costed $24 (May 17th purchase) = $96. Total COGS = $40 + $96 = $136.
Answer:
A) relative advantage
Explanation:
A product's relative advantage over its competitors means the aspects at which one good or service is perceived as better or superior to other competing products. This concept is similar to comparative advantage, but from the consumer point of view. Consumers will value one product more because of its relative advantages over its competitors.
