Answer:
The correct option here is B)
Explanation:
The non compete clause is an agreement between an employer and employee ( as it is in this question between Roger and HR consulting firm ) , where an employee agree to the wishes of employer to not to work for firms which are competing against the employer in the same market.
Answer:
net income increased by $1,537.50
Explanation:
Obviously, the original income statement is missing, so I looked for a similar question:
sales revenue $16,500
COGS <u>($9,300)</u>
Gross profit $7,200
Operating exp.:
- Administrative $950
- Depreciation $1,300
- Shipping $412.50 <u>($2,662.50)</u>
Net income $4,537.50
net income increased by $4,537.50 - $3,000 = $1,537.50
Answer:
3.60
Explanation:
Given that,
Sales units = 1,000
Sales price per unit = $60
Variable expenses = 40% of the selling price
Total Fixed cost = $26,000
Contribution margin per unit:
= Selling price - Variable cost
= $60 - ($60 × 40%)
= $60 - $24
= $36
Total contribution:
= Contribution margin per unit × Sales units
= $36 × 1,000
= $36,000
Profit = Total contribution - Fixed cost
= $36,000 - $26,000
= $10,000
Degree of operating leverage:
= (Sales - Variable costs) ÷ (Sales - Variable costs - Fixed Expenses)
= (60,000 - 24,000) ÷ (60,000 - 24,000 - 26,000)
= 36,000 ÷ 10,000
= 3.60
Answer:
Stock R more beta than Stock S = 4.2%
Explanation:
given data
Stock R beta = 1.8
Stock S beta = 0.75
expected rate of return = 9% = 0.09
risk-free rate = 5% = 0.05
solution
we get here Required Return
Required Return (Re) = risk-free rate + ( expected rate of return - risk-free rate ) beta ...........1
Required Return (Re) = 0.05 + ( 0.09 - 0.05 ) B
Required Return (Re) =
so here
Stock R = 0.05 + ( 0.09 - 0.05 ) 1.8
Stock R = 0.122 = 12.2 %
and
Stock S = 0.05 + ( 0.09 - 0.05 ) 0.75
Stock S = 0.08 = 8%
so here more risky stock is R and here less risky stock is S
Stock R is more beta than the Stock S.
Stock R more beta Stock S = 12.2 % - 8%
Stock R more beta Stock S = 4.2%
