Answer:
The answer is: <u>calcite</u>
Explanation:
Caliche is a natural hardened cement, which is composed of calcium carbonate. It is a layer of soil which binds the other soil materials like sand, gravel, silt and clay together.
Caliche is naturally formed in desert soil after rainstorms. During precipitation, the calcium dissolved in rain water is added to the desert soil, which then combines with the dissolved carbon dioxide in the soil water to form insoluble calcium carbonate, known as calcite.
Answer:
the reason why hosa require students to joint through local chapter instead of joining as individuals is :
Hosa activities are so closely connected with the school curriculum,
And this curriculum usually more compatible if it's carried out in groups.
Hope this helps! if so mark brainliest plz
The answer is "operant conditoning".
Operant conditioning is a technique for discovering that happens through prizes and disciplines for conduct. Through operant conditioning , an individual makes a relationship between a specific conduct and an outcome.
Operant conditioning depends on a genuinely basic preface - activities that are trailed by fortification will be reinforced and more inclined to happen again later on. In the event that you recount an entertaining story in class and everyone snickers, you will presumably probably recount that story again later on.
Answer:
C. % decrease in cost per click and cost per impression
Explanation:
Generally speaking, an employee advocacy program is a type of marketing technique where the employees of an organization take an active role in promoting the company and its brands. This is done through exposure on social media and outside the internet, with the employees recommending or talking about the brand to their family, friends, and followers.
When running an employee advocacy program, eventually you’ll need to pull data to demonstrate the program’s effectiveness. Some of the metric that the program managers will look at are: how many employees and sales leads have been recruited and generated since the start of the program; how many advocate engagements there are, that is, users who actively engage in brand promotion; social reach, that is, measuring the volume of content being shared to all different social networks; and finally, the volume of website traffic that has been brought by the employee shares. One metric that isn't really important, however, is the <u>% decrease in cost per click and cost per impression</u>. While this data might be valuable to the IT or accounting departments, it doesn't say anything about how the employee advocacy program is going.
There is no objective answer to this question, as both sides have arguments that support their views.
If you believe that you are bound by Hobbes' argument, it is because of tacit consent. Tacit consent means that, even though you have not explicitly agreed to follow laws, you have indicated your agreement through other means, for example, by using the public services of the government or by remaining within the limits of your country. Also, you could argue that any rational person would prefer to follow the rules of the government than to live in the state of nature. Therefore, if you are rational, your consent is assumed. Finally, you could also argue that while you did not explicitly agreed, maybe your ancestors did, which still binds you as a member of the same society.
On the other hand, if you believe that you are not bound by Hobbes' argument, you could argue that any contract that is not freely agreed upon is not valid. As the government uses force to make you act according to the law, you cannot be considered to be freely consenting. Also, you can argue that agreeing to follow some rules does not imply following <em>all</em> of the laws of the country. Finally, a common argument against Hobbes is the lack of empirical data. As we do not know if the state of nature is actually bad, or if the contract ever happened, the government cannot gain its legitimacy in that way.
