1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
scoundrel [369]
3 years ago
5

After world war what was wilsons organization

History
1 answer:
aev [14]3 years ago
3 0
The answer is the League of Nations. Its successor is the UN, or the United Nations.
You might be interested in
Hitler intended to defeat Great Britain by
gayaneshka [121]
Answer;
Hitler intended to defeat Great Britain by; A massive bombing attack;

Explanation; 
After the French armistice was signed on 22 June, Britain was the only country resisting Germany. Hitler did not wish to invade Britain, after the fall of France, he assumed the British would simply surrender. 
Hitler was therefore surprised when Britain did not surrender. On july 16 he gave a directive which authorized detailed preparations for an invasion landing in Britain, code named operation Sealion.


3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of these themes is most closely associated with the Pure Food and Drug Act?
Snowcat [4.5K]
Please list the themes.
7 0
3 years ago
What was the significance of the proclamation not taking effect immediately?
adell [148]

Procrastination I think possibly

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HEY CAN ANYONE PLS ANSWER DIS!
bearhunter [10]

Explanation: No, this shouldn't be a law because if a theif overcomes you in a fight because you cant use a weapon then he could kill you. The theif is also a criminal not worthy of this life if he wants to steal, so killing him wouldnt be as big of a problem. If the theif runs away with items then using a weapon could stop him.

3 0
3 years ago
What was the ruling in the Supreme Court case of Yick Wo v. Hopkins? The court ruled that Chinese students could be forced to at
Usimov [2.4K]

Answer:

the first case where the United States Supreme Court ruled that a law that is race-neutral on its face, but is administered in a prejudicial manner, is an infringement of the Equal Protection Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Explanation:

the court ruled that chinese americans did not enjoy the same rights as native-born americans. the court ruled that chinese people born in the united states could be prohibited from entering the country.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The constitution applies to everyone and everything what’s the myth?
    12·1 answer
  • Where is the celebration of halloween thought to have come from?
    15·1 answer
  • How many miles did the cherokee walk on the trail of tears?
    10·1 answer
  • Match the economic information with the correct colonial regions:
    8·2 answers
  • Did Burke most likely agree or disagree with the radical course of the French Revolution?
    13·1 answer
  • How and why did different systems of governance develop in various Chinese dynasties as a method of responding to the issues tha
    14·1 answer
  • What was the perspective of Americans on the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan? Americans marched on Washington to protest Presiden
    10·1 answer
  • What was the main mode of transportation along the African trade routes?
    11·1 answer
  • 12. Sobre o processo de conquista da América espanhola, responda a
    6·2 answers
  • Someone plsss help me with this I will make you brain
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!