Answer:
The rule which states that if a verb is in past tense, then its subject should be in past tense too and if it's in present tense, the subject should also be in present tense.
“I was amazed at his equanimity in the face of danger.”
The verb "was" is in past tense so is the subject "amazed".
Explanation:
A simple subject-verb agreement definition says that the subject of the sentence and the verb of the sentence must be in agreement in number/tense.
If the sentence is written like this
“I am amaze at his equanimity in the face of danger.”
If the verb "was" is replaced by "am" and the subject "amazed" is replaced by "amaze", the sentence would become incorrect as it disregards the subject verb agreement.
Answer:
I don't get your question.
Explanation:
I would use it by putting money towards cures for sickness many suffer from
The answer choice that best summarizes the passage is A. “I would like to keep fighting, but it would be harmful to the nation to do so."
<h3>What is a Summary?</h3>
This refers to the concise representation of the main points of a text without the use of bias.
Hence, we can see that from the complete text, we can see that there is the narration of the words of a person, and the best summary that captures the details is option A.
Read more about summaries here:
brainly.com/question/25605883
#SPJ4
Many of it is ending up in landfills and were not recycling enough of it.