Answer:
Use ur own word
Explanation:
This exposition propels uneven prove and clarifications in supporting its examination of Kennedy’s explanatory procedures. The primary illustration employments a family representation (father, senior child, and more youthful child) in arrange to recognize the triangulation of Kennedy, the steel administrators, and the American individuals within the discourse. The student’s utilize of the family representation disentangles the setting of the discourse, and the characterization of Kennedy’s tone as fatherly isn't totally well-suited. Be that as it may, the family similarity isn't entirely wrong; it permits the understudy to get it how Kennedy is in an definitive position to settle blame: he allots blame to the senior child (the steel industry) for pointlessly incurring torment on the more youthful one (an guiltless American open). In spite of the fact that the utilize of the allegory may be strained, it in any case succeeds in highlighting the workings of sentiment. As advance prove of the unevenness of this exposition, the moment section makes an satisfactory perception almost the differentiate between The two.
Answer:
<u>W</u><u>e</u><u>l</u><u>l</u><u> </u><u>i</u><u>n short, your thesis must address the comparison. 2) Your thesis (and essay) should stay within the parameters of the question or prompt. An essay on the Columbian exchange should not deal with the Swahili Coast of Africa . 3) Next, your thesis should state an opinion.</u>
Shark : fish :: koala : bear
At least I think it is because a shark is a fish so I guess a koala is to bear.
I hope I helped :)
I believe the correct answer is B. <span>The quick production of fast food has a negative effect on the quality and safety of the products.
The statement that the author used is talking about the speed that takes these products to be prepared, and option B is the only statement which even remotely mentions the preparation speed, which is why I'd choose that option as the correct answer.</span>