They are similar because the bill of rights was not obligatory when it was made, the states didn't have to abide by it yet because the supreme court didn't decide so. The Arizona Article II was similar to it to make sure the state abides by it. They are different for the simple reason that there are parts that are not based on the bill of rights, like the bill of rights has things not found in it, but the essence is the same.
<span>Chief Joseph is commenting on the reservation system. the u.s government developed reservation systems. the u.s government developed reservations as a way to promote white settlements of land formely occupied by Indians. chief joseph believes that Indians are bound to fail within that system. he draws a parallel between a native american and another living creature, a horse, as he explains that an indian need freedom of movement in order to be happy and healthy. chief Joseph uses three words to characterize a healthy, positive living situation-contented, grow, and prosper-and he believes that this kin of life is impossible for indians to achieve if their physical movements are restricted by the government.</span>
Nancy pelosi is the speaker of the house and represents california
Your answer would be To protect the Spanish territory from the french
Hope i helped :)
The management of charter colonies was carried out through the system of already established or newly formed traditional institutions of local power included in the general administrative scheme, while other colonies maintained traditional management systems, but adapted them to the needs of the colonial power.
