US stance on the French intervention in Mexico is to avoid the direct conflict with the France and US have become silent and doing no innervation in the Mexican affairs, but they also remained neutral in the conflict.
<h3>How did the United States respond to the French takeover of Mexico?</h3>
Abraham Lincoln has denied acknowledging the Maximilian and French meddling in Mexican affairs. Lincoln saw this as a contravention of the Monroe Doctrine, which alerted European countries that the US would not endure further meddling in Western Hemisphere countries.
Thus, US stance on the French intervention in Mexico is to avoid the direct conflict.
For more details about the United States respond to the French takeover of Mexico, click here:
brainly.com/question/1286959
#SPJ4
The Constitutional Convention dealt with the slave population by developing the 3/5ths Compromise. The 3/5ths Compromise stated that for every 5 slaves, 3 of them will count towards a states population regarding representation in the House of Representatives and for taxation purposes. This allowed for slave states to have signficiant political power in the House but also results in the state government having to pay more direct taxes to the federal government.
Answer:i dont really know
Explanation:
Allies opened a second front in Europe, but it was a long process that took years. Taking years to plan and come up with ideas on how they would do this, this got a code name called Operation Overload. By June 1944, almost 3 million troops were ready for the invasion. On June 6, 1944 the day know as D-Day had started. 4,000 ships filled with Allies invaded France. Although going under heavy gun fire, the Allies pushed on. They would not retreat. More and more Allies continued coming onto France, eventually reaching Paris. After four years of being ruled by the Nazis, France was finally free.
A, I think. It was a terrible place