Answer:
B
Explanation:
Both types of democracies give power to the people. All other choices are either incorrect or portray anti-democracy ideals.
During World War I:
(C) German submarines made unrestricted attacks on ships.
<h3 /><h3>Further explanation</h3>
During the year 1917, the underwater battles of the First World War took place most intense in the Atlantic Ocean. Since the German navy, Kaiserliche Marine was much less powerful than the British Navy, Royal Navy, the Germans had to use submarines to be invisible and to be able to sink allied ships. The problem with this tactic was that by attacking underwater, it was not possible to see which country owned the boats attacked. That's why in May 1915, the Germans sank a British ocean liner, the Lusitania, and killed 123 Americans.
The German armies had to suspend their submarine attacks for two years to prevent the United States from declaring war on them. However, as they began to suffer some defeat and also because the war lasted too long, their submarines began firing again from January 1917. This decision pushed the United States declared war on Germany, and the year 1917 was a year of total war in the Atlantic ocean.
During the World war I, the 345 German U-Boote had sunk 6394 merchant ships and nearly 100 warships. Despite their defeat in this global conflict, the Germans have been effective in this type of attack.
<h3>Learn more</h3>
- European alliances before World War I: brainly.com/question/921155
- The Blitzkrieg: brainly.com/question/10537685
- The western front: brainly.com/question/452682
<h3>Answer details</h3>
Subject: History
Chapter: World War I
Keywords: Submarines during World War I, Germany tactic during World War I, Lusitania sinking, the United States in World War I
The answer is A. The attack on pearl harbor
Answer:
Beginnings. The Farmers' Union was established in central Texas in 1877, through the endeavors of agriculturists at self-protection from 'land sharks,' shippers, horse hoodlums, and cattle ranchers.
Explanation:
Every year, the Federal Reserve conducts a massive survey of American households to paint a portrait of their economic habits and spirits. The recently published findings for 2017 are worth examining for what they say about who should — and shouldn't — get credit for the resilient U.S. economy.
There is nothing unusual about this. When the economy does well, presidents of both parties routinely brag about the results. Trump did just that last week with the latest jobs report. But as I — and many other commentators — have written, the $20 trillion economy is simply too big and complicated to be easily manipulated for partisan advantage.
