Answer:
This is because it draws attention to the preconception the migrants faced.
Explanation:
In "Okies Have Lice" from years of dust, The text is a side bar. it goes like this; "Surrounding communities resented the newcomers. some locals assumed that because Okies were poor, they deserved to be poor, they had brought poverty upon themselves through Laziness, ignorance, and immorality." Too often, Okie children met bias in a school. "The better dressed children shout and jeer," A parent told John Steinbeck. " The teachers are quite often impatient with these addition to their duties, and the parents of the nice children do not want to have disease carriers in their schools" After all, everyone just 'knew' that "Okies have lice".
Answer: Well actually the Fourscore and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal." "Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure.
Have a blessed day mam/sir. ;)
« The Battle of Freeman’s FarmThe Nullification Crisis »Hamilton Vs. Jefferson
December 29, 2006 by Ando
I had intended to post Part II of the WWI question last night, but got caught up doing movie reviews on Life of Ando. So to slake your ravenous historical thirst in the meantime, here is my assignment from my history class this past week. If you’re really into American history and how the politics of the early Republic shook out, Jefferson vs. Hamilton is a great study. It’s also a little, I guess comforting, to know that as bad as we think today’s politicians are, politics was always a very dirty game. Like Bismarck said, “Laws are like sausages. Better to not see them being made.” And as Ecclesiastes says, “There’s nothing new under the sun.”
1) How did the political philosophies of these men differ?
Most clear thinking Americans could probably tell you at least the rudimentary facts of who Thomas Jefferson was. Far fewer would likely have a definite idea of who Alexander Hamilton was and what his contributions as a Founding Father were. Yet his conception of an American government was just as important as that of Jefferson. Both founders foresaw the new nation as a great future power, and both had very different maps of how to get it there.
Jefferson believed the nation’s strength lay in its agricultural roots. He favored an agrarian nation with most powers reserved for the states. He was very opposed to a strong central authority and believed that the people were the final authority in government. Jefferson also encouraged active support for the French Revolution
Hamilton favored a strong central authority. He believed a strong government was necessary to provide order so that business and industry could grow. He envisioned America becoming an industrial power. To this end he sought to establish a national bank and fund the national debt in order to establish firm base for national credit. Hamilton believed that the government should be run by those who were educated and wealthy rather than by “the mob.” He opposed involvement in the French Revolution and worried Jeffersonians by appearing, and maybe even being, too cozy with Britain.
Since our method of communication wasn't very reliable, I couldn't get enough details. So if you see any mistakes, I apologize. I've tried to fit the criteria you've described, and I hope it works for you.
Answer:
a part added either before or after a root word
Explanation:
The affixes are elements of the language that can appear before or after the root of the word, modifying it and changing its meaning. Affixes can be given two names:
Suffix: It has a morphological function and appears after the root of the word: Ex: Reality, prosperity.
Prefix: It has a semantic function and appears before the root of the word. Ex: Unhappy, insecure.
