The correct answer is D) After the big game, my family wanted to celebrate. To understand why it's important to know that an adverbial phrase is when the adverb is used to describe <u>when, where, how, how often or how long</u> something happens. In this case, we have an adverbial phrase of time because it states when something happens: "<em>After the big game</em>" this part help us to understand when the action happens , also the reason behind why they wanted to celebrate and at the end, it adds more detail to the sentence "<em>My family wanted to celebrate</em>".
The adverb is placed at the beginning of the sentence so we can cross out the <u>option B</u> and also the <u>option C.</u> The option B is describing where the family come from and "from out of town" doesn't function here as an adverb, the function here is to describe the precedence of the family but no more details. <u>The option A</u> is incorrect because when we use "<em>entire</em>" as an adverb it only goes after a verb and in this case, we have "<em>entire family</em>" so it goes with a noun and it's not correct as an adverbial phrase.
1. <span>Lifting clear on the crest of a great jam off Indian River, Walt Masters met with his first accident.
2.</span><span>bravery can help you outlast an opponent
3.</span><span>the proper lead dog was now to the fore, and he stretched low and whined with joy as he his comrades along </span>
In the year 1666, Samuel Pepys describes the Great London Fire as a terrible fire that had destroyed a large part of London.Pepys was more distressed when he is able to see the fire more closely. He observes how pervasive it is and how much devastation and adversity it has caused.
The answer is C, that’s all I’ve gathered from the info given
1. Valid. The statement shows that if rock comes from Venus, it doesn't contain silicon. Rocks came either Mars or Venus. SO when rock contains silicon, it came from Mars not Venus.
(If Venus, then NOT silicon)
(Venus OR Mars)
(Silicon)
(Mars; Valid)
2. Invalid. It is not true that people with happiness must have a lot of money. The first premise is a false premise. Secondly, it is not true that people earn a lot of money with hard working. The second premise is also a false premise. Therefore this is an invalid statement.
Hope this help you