Sentence 3 is correct. "Every time I see you, he laughed, you are on the phone." They are laced correctly there. he pauses after he says "ervy time I see you" Then he pauses to laugh, then he continues. 3 is correct.
~Silver
Answer:
A
. Because the Cuban Missile Crisis resulted in the end of all U.S. flights to and from Cuba.
Explanation:
Operation Peter Pan, or known in Cuba as Pedro Pan, was the effort of the United States government to ensure the safety of Cuban children amidst the rise of Fidel Castro's rise in power. This effort was a humanitarian act to ensure the safety of the children of the dissident parents of the latest Cuban government's communist regime.
But this 'relief' effort was left hanging by the Cuban Missile Crisis that 'cut' all ties between the two nations. The Crisis led to the discontinuation of the flights from Cuba, resulting in the children stranded in the US while their parents were unable to leave Cuba and join their children.
Thus, the correct answer is option A.
Answer:
1, 2 and 5
Explanation:
A bond may be issued by the govt or a public company to raise cash for the time being and return it to the investors when the bond matures. While on the other hand, stocks are a small ownership of the company which you buy at the prevailing price in the stock market. The bonds are held for long term whereas stocks can be bought and sold within the same day. The return on bonds are stated before while stocks depend on the volatility of the stock market therefore its riskier.
Make a quick, subconscious determination as to whether the consequence in question is important - how will it affect my life, the future, if it will affect the people in my life and how.
If it does not affect others or myself that much, I follow my instinct about whether the action is right or wrong. After that act on it and the results automatically modifies my mentality for future decisions.
If the consequence in question is likely to be high then I think long and hard about the decision. I do not make a snap decision in this case (as above), instead I take responsibility and make sure I get information in order to make the best choice.
Then process the information to determine whether the action will affect the happiness and survival of the people involved, whether it will affect the dynamic of my family, whether it will be against a cultural norm, whether it breaks any laws, whether anyone will be physically harmed and so forth.
After determining all these factors I weigh the costs against the benefits to those same categories (as well as to myself) and then I will take action.
I deal with any consequences and then (as above) evaluate the results and let that information guide future decisions.
The issue of integrity is that the company is ignoring her civil rights as an individual.
In this case, the woman is sexually harassed by a top-level senior executive in a large company. There should be a higher moral standard for the company itself, this executive is going to present an inappropriate image for the company.
The woman can decline the settlement amount and continue with the sexual harassment case or that she can accept the settlement, keep her job. She should not collect the money and continue the case. This will help in putting an end to the act.
Learn more about integrity on:
brainly.com/question/1188458