1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lubasha [3.4K]
3 years ago
5

1)Why is it impossible for a function to have fewer values in its domain than in its range?

Mathematics
1 answer:
Aneli [31]3 years ago
7 0

<u>Part (1):</u>

For a relation to be called a function, each input must have one and only one corresponding output.

Now, we know that the input of the relation is known as its domain while the output is known as its range.

Based on the above definition, each input (value from domain) has only one output (value from range)

Therefore, the values for domain and range are equal, otherwise, the relation won't be a function


<u>Part (2):</u>

The graph of the function is shown in the attached image.

<u>Now, a linear function:</u>

<u>1- is a straight line.</u> This means that it has neither curved nor sharped bends.

In the graph of the given function, we can see that it has a sharp bend at the point (5,0)

<u>2- has a constant slope all over the graph.</u>

Let's test this condition on our graph:

For the two points (0,5) and (1,4):

slope = \frac{4-5}{1-0} = -1

For the two points (6,1) and (7,2):

slope = \frac{2-1}{7-6} = 1

We can see that the slope is not constant along the whole graph.

Based on the above two conditions, the absolute function is not a linear function


<u>Part(3):</u>

<u>There are two types of proportionality:</u>

1- Direct proportionality: This means that as one value increases, the other would increase at the same rate

<u>Let's check this on the given function:</u>

f (x) = -3x

At x = 1 ..........> f (x) = -3(1) = -3

At x = 2 .........> f (x) = -3(2) = -6

We can note that the condition of direct proportionality is not fulfilled, therefore, the relation is <u>not showing direct proportionality</u>

2- Inverse proportionality: This means that as one value increases, the other would decrease by the same rate.

Inverse proportionality has the general formula: y = \frac{k}{x}

where k is the constant of proportionality.

The given function is: f (x) = -3x

We can note that it does not have the same format as the general formula of the inverse proportionality.

Therefore, the given<u> relation does not show inverse proportionality</u>

Based on the above, we can conclude that the given relation is non-proportional


<u>Part (4):</u>

The graphs are shown in the second attached image

<u>Let's check the givens:</u>

<u>1) y = 9</u>

We know that this would be a line parallel to the x-axis constant at y = 9

Therefore, this choice is correct

<u>2) -2x² + 4</u>

We know that the second degree polynomial gives a curve not a line.

Therefore, this choice is incorrect

<u>3) y = -8 + 3</u>

The general form of the linear line is y = mx + b

The given equation has the same format as the general one.

Therefore, this choice is correct

<u>4) y = 7/x</u>

Again, the general form of the linear line is y = mx + b

The given equation has the a different format than the general one.

Therefore, this choice is incorrect


Hope this helps :)

You might be interested in
Write the equation of the line in slope-intercept form.
Ymorist [56]

Answer:

y = 1/40x + 20

Step-by-step explanation:

Slope-intercept equation format:

y = mx + b

m = slope/ gradient/ constant of variation/ rate of change

b = y-intercept

To find the slope, use the formula:

\frac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}

Find  two random points:

1 - (0.5, 40) , 2 - (1, 60)

Plug in:

\frac{60-40}{1-0.5}

Solve:

\frac{20}{0.5}

Divide:

\frac{1}{40}

The y-intercept is when the x-coordinate is equal to 0.

The y-intercept is always the beginning.

So observing the graph, the first point is (0, 20)

The x-coordinate is 0.

Y intercept = 20.

Plug in both slope and y-intercept:

y = 1/40x + 20

8 0
2 years ago
Esto es verdadero oh falso <br> como se resuelve<br> 3/4 + 1/2 + 1/3 + 2/9 + ...... = 9/4
Step2247 [10]

Answer

The missing value is 4/9

8 0
3 years ago
An architect's scale drawing of a new school is 8.4 inches long. The scale used in the drawing is 2 inches = 8 feet.
Brut [27]

Answer:

33.6f eet

Step-by-step explanation:

if

2=8 then

8.4x8= 67.2/2= 33.6 feet

3 0
3 years ago
What is 9 divided by 1504
Tom [10]

Answer:

9 ÷ 1504 = 0 R 9

0.00598404255

Step-by-step explanation:

Shown above is remainder form and decimal form...

4 0
3 years ago
У = 2х – 6<br>у = х2 – 4х + 2​
Dafna11 [192]
Your answer would be (x,y)=(2,-2)
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • (a-12)x = a+8 in the equation to the left, a is a constant. if the equation has no solutions, what is the value of a?
    11·1 answer
  • What is the equation of a line that passes through (1, 3) and has a slope of 2?
    11·1 answer
  • Tom's mark of a maths test was 68.This was 20% worse than his mark in English.what was Tom's English mark ?
    14·1 answer
  • Find the perimeter of the figure to the nearest hundredth.<br> Please consider helping!
    14·1 answer
  • If RX=4 and XS=9, then XT=<br> And how do you get it?
    13·1 answer
  • Ted knows the actual distance between two cities is 150 miles. His map shows a distance of 2 inches between these cities. What i
    15·1 answer
  • A plane averaged 500 mph on a trip going east, but only 200 mph on the return trip. The total flying time in both directions was
    10·1 answer
  • Suppose that a school of 452 students is having a debate about gun control, and the students were asked to vote. The results sho
    11·1 answer
  • Please help solve both due soon
    13·1 answer
  • H(1)=-35<br><br>h(n)=h(n-1)*2<br><br>h(3)=
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!