Answer:
$34,000
Explanation:
Because the SUV weighs over 6,000 pounds, it is not subject to the statutory dollar limits on luxury automobiles.
Under section 179 expensing (limited to $25,000 for SUVs)
= $25,000
Regular MACRS:
= [($70,000 - $25,000) × 0.20}]
= 9,000
Ariff's maximum deduction for 2019 would be:
= $25,000 + $9,000
= $34,000
Answer:
$3.68 million
Explanation:
Reserve Ratio = 8%
Reserves are currently = $25 million
Amount of deposits = $ 312.5 million
Deposit outflow = $4 million
Remaining Deposits = Amount of deposits - Deposit outflow
= $ 312.5 million - $4 million
= $308.5 million
Current Required Reserve after outflow of deposits(CR):
= $25 million - $4 million
= $21 million
Therefore,
Shortage of Reserve = CR - (Remaining Deposits × Reserve Ratio)
= $21 - ($308.5 × 0.08)
= $21 - $24.68
= -($3.68)
Therefore, the reserve shortage created by a deposit outflow of $4 million is $3.68 million
Answer:
negatively correlated
Explanation:
Variables are negatively correlated if an increase in one variable causes a decrease in the other variable. Negative correlation usually has a value of -1.
The psychologists found that rich people are less satisfied with their jobs compared to poor people, so as one's wealth increases, job satisfaction decreases. This shows that wealth and job sanctification are negatively correlated.
Variables are positively correlated if an increase in one variable causes a increase in the other variable. Negative correlation usually has a value of +1.
If wealth and job satisfaction were positively correlated, rich people would have more job satisfaction when compared to poor people
Option A and C
In quasi-contract cases, the defendant received a benefit from the plaintiff. In promissory estoppel cases, the defendant made a promise that the plaintiff relied on.
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
A quasi-contract is a retroactive system among two parties who own no prior commitments to one another. It is designed by an expert to change a situation in which one individual takes something at the value of the other. The plaintiff must have provided a substantial thing or service to the added party with the expectation or assumption that mortgage would be supplied.
Promissory estoppel is a concept in contract law that hinders a character from performing reverse on a commitment even if a legitimate contract does not endure.