Answer: Reliance on legal precedent
Explanation:
Reliance on legal precedent should be a key factor in court's ruling since if stakeholders cant's success on mediating their reliance on precedent forfeit, then any claim they'do therefore, it'll be taken under stare decisis doctrine. This comes from a judicial theory that states: when a pronouncement has built enough reliance, then a presumption against adjudicative change must follow.
Answer: 1. 1854 bill that mandated popular sovereignty. It allowed settlers to decide if they wanted slavery in their state or not.
2. The North was very very very mad. The Missouri Compromise had made this from happening all the way back in 1820.
3. It was greatly praised. But anti slave people in the South wanted another vote. But pro slave people didn't vote because they wanted to keep slavery.
4. President Franklin Pierce
5. It allowed people to decide for themselves and they didn't have to like slavery
Explanation: Brainliest please
China joined the side of the Tripple Entente during World War I.
Someone important...
hahaha, sorry
John D. Rockefeller was an American business magnate and philanthropist in the oil industry. He is considered to be the wealthiest American, and the richest in modern history.
P.S. a simple google search would give you the answer ;)
The correct answer is:
D. Only use the amount of food needed.
