Answer:
In the statements prior to the given statement, the author makes their opinion clear. The introductory sentence states, "How can a human being with any claim to a sense of moral responsibility deliberately let loose an instrument of destruction." Off of this statement alone, it is evident that the author strongly questions the morality and ethicalness of dropping a nuclear bomb. It goes on to state "This is not war: . . . this is pure nihilism."
Thus when the author states "strikes at the very basis of moral existence?" they strongly believe that dropping a nuclear bomb is immoral and unethical, they question the meaning of being human if "the very foundations or morality are overthrown" by dropping a nuclear bomb.
I hope this helps.
Fever and chills
Extreme weakness
Abdominal pain, diarrhea and vomiting
Bleeding from your mouth, nose or rectum, or under your skin
Shock
Answer:
volveríamos al sistema en dónde éramos gobernados por los españoles o tal vez a los reyes y reinas (olvidé el nombre del sistema de los reyes)
<span><span>1. </span><span>Nullification doctrine is said that the
states residing within the Union is undocumented. Supposed Aliens and sedition
acts was passed to punish those who opposed the federal laws and regulations. However,
it was Thomas Jefferson who thought that this act may affect the Bill of Human
rights, so he decided to make an equally unconstitutional doctrine that states
if a government would implement a law, a state could refuse to follow it. John Calhoun, soon adapted the Nullification
doctrine</span></span>
c.
the population of politicians, lawyers, and opportunists.
