Okay here it goes: She is basing her research on the results of the survey.<span />
He wrote it to argue that the characteristics associated with the American national character were indeed forged on the western frontier.
He also argues that it was the Western frontier and it was not the Eastern frontier. I hope this answer helps you out and that you have a great day!!! <3 :)
One of the "paganic" beliefs that the Aztecs thought at the prehistoric time would be that in order to continue the sun on moving, it must be fed with a precious fluid, at which time they guessed it could be human blood. They made a lot of human sacrifices for the sun in which these humans are mostly slaves or prisoners.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
One of the “don’ts” in analyzing or evaluating a primary source is to avoid recreating the author’s experience of his society.
No, I don't agree with this statement because I consider that in order to truly understand the primary source, a good researcher has to understand the circumstance and the time in which the primary source was created.
This means, if it was during a war or a revolutionary period, the researcher has to understand and think as the author of the source did.
ANd I am clear using my words: understand. Not biasing the records, the facts, or misinterpret the situation, the context, or the facts.
