The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached or further references or context, we can say the following.
Regarding the French debt, the costs that seemed justified were the French intervention in the Seven Years War, because France had a great rivalry against England, and France had to send troops to the North American territory and other parts of the European continent.
Another justified cost was the support the government of France offered the Continental Army when it was fighting against the British troops during the Revolutionary War of Independence. At that time, the United Kingdom was the natural enemy of France.
Now, the costs that seemed unjustified were the following. First the construction of luxurious buildings such as the Versailles Palace, in the outskirts of Paris. This was an excessive massive luxurious building in a time where most of the French people were very poor.
The other unjustified cost was the extravagant parties and luxurious lifestyle of the King of France Louis XIV and his wife Maria Antonieta. Fancy parties, fancy clothes, and fancy food, when the Third State in France was dying of hunger.
We then can say that a class conflict started the revolution.
The French Revolution began in 1789. The Storming of the Bastille started the hostilities in Paris, France. French people were tired of the tyranny of the monarch. The class system had produced social inequality and the tax burden on the thirds state (the commoners, the poor people) angered the French.
The 13 colonist is. 13 state in the northwest. They were under power by a he British. Where they had mercantilism and pass raw materials. Thomas Jefferson and the colonist were mad because the British were taxing on every single things. So Thomas Jefferson wrote the declaration independence which is the revolutionary war. Which made America the United state of America.
D was resisted by conservative
Solve for x by simplifying both sides of the equation, then isolating the variable
x = -1
Hope this helps! :)
Answer:
The correct answer is A. The clear and present danger was adopted by the U.S. Supreme Court after it found the bad tendency test allowed government to punish too much harmless speech.
Explanation:
The rule of clear and present danger is a principle adopted as a standard that restricts freedom of speech and the press. It is a standard used when a court or related agency tries to suppress it with a suspension order, etc. in case it leaks or infringes on the honor or privacy of others. It was first used by Justice Holmes in the Schenck v. United States (1919).
This principle imposes restrictions on the media only if there is a current risk of direct harm, or if the act is intended to cause such harm.
Justice Holmes judged "degree and proximity." In other words, the requirements were assessed to be significant and clear risks (degrees) and clear or present (risk or present).
