Answer: your answer would be A
Explanation:
Answer:
These rules however were not fair for everyone. Lower casts such as the Vaisyas, Sudras, and the Untouchables were treated worse then the Brahmins and Kshatriyas. This was bound to cause conflict, because lower casts would eventually rebel against higher casts and this would cause chaos. The rules of jati would create conflict, not prevent conflict.
Explanation:
The best option from the list would be that "<span>A. A factory dumps its industrial waste into a river that serves as a source of drinking water for a nearby town," since a main goal of the Progressives was to expose the negative societal impacts large corporations had in the US. </span>
Through much of the nineteenth century, Great Britain avoided the kind of social upheaval that intermittently plagued the Continent between 1815 and 1870. Supporters of Britain claimed that this success derived from a tradition of vibrant parliamentary democracy. While this claim holds some truth, the Great Reform Bill of 1832, the landmark legislation that began extending the franchise to more Englishmen, still left the vote to only twenty percent of the male population. A second reform bill passed in 1867 vertically expanded voting rights, but power remained in the hands of a minority--property-owning elites with a common background, a common education, and an essentially common outlook on domestic and foreign policy. The pace of reform in England outdistanced that of the rest of Europe, but for all that remained slow. Though the Liberals and Conservatives did advance different philosophy on the economy and government in its most basic sense, the common brotherhood on all representatives in parliament assured a relatively stable policy-making history.
Sorry it's so long but that's the answer toy your question...Hope this helps:)
