The correct options are B. Maggie may have to pay thousands of dollars to repair and replace her possessions, D. Maggie may lose her home E. Maggie may go into debt.
The missing words states <em>"Maggie called her insurance agent after estimating the damages. She had already spent $2,000 on pumping out the water and repairing the hot water heater, which had corroded in places. The agent was polite. He had been getting hundreds of similar calls. . . . "Ma'am, I'm sorry, but according to our records, you do not have flood insurance protections in your policy."</em>
- Let understand that every Insurance policy have its limit of coverage. For instance, a Motor insurance policy can not pay compensation on damage caused to the owner's buildings by Fire Peril.
- It is important to know that if the Home policy does cover the Flood peril, Maggie will be entitled for full compensation on damage caused by the Flood Peril.
- Based on the response of the Insurance Agent who have vast knowledge about the policy, then, we are quite sure the Home Policy does not have Flood coverage.
In conclusion, she will likely need to pay thousands of dollars to repair and replace her possessions which might result to debt or losing her home if she does nothing.
Read more about this here
<em>brainly.com/question/9401344</em>
Answer:
C
Explanation:
It prevents other variables such as independent variables and extraneous variables from affecting the validity of results. It also makes it easier to compare results when variables are changed.
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
Selenium atoms have 34 electrons and the shell structure is 2.8. 18.6. The ground state electron configuration of ground state gaseous neutral selenium is [Ar].
Please mark me as the brainliest and thanks
Answer:
The answer is <u><em>X: Load, Y: Fulcrum, Z: Lever</em></u>
Explanation:
I've taken this question before!
Hope this helps! :D
(Can you mark me brainliest? It is greatly appreciated!)
- <em><u>❤ 7272033Alt ❤</u></em>
Originally, the SAT I was meant to test aptitude and the SAT II was meant to test achievement. That is to say, one tested what you were capable of and the other tested what you knew. But when the College Board moved away from the idea that the SAT I tests innate ability, they framed it as a reasoning test, making the difference between the two less defined.
With the latest changes, the SAT I (now just the SAT) is more focused than ever testing knowledge rather than logic. At this point, I would say that the SAT tests general knowledge and and the Subject Tests assess topical knowledge.
