1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ipn [44]
4 years ago
5

What view did Americans have after President Reagan handled the Air Traffic Controllers Strike? Americans believed that Reagan’s

handling of the strike violated the Fifth Amendment. Americans believed that Reagan would take swift action if anyone challenged the government. Americans believed that Reagan did not support unions and wanted to send a strong message. Americans believed that President Reagan was weak on handling the nation’s issues.
History
2 answers:
Rus_ich [418]4 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Americans believed that Reagan would take swift action if anyone challenged the government.

Explanation:

The year 1981 was Ronald Reagan's first in the White House. After the failed attack of mallet, the great opportunity to set guidelines for the Hollywood actor turned into a conservative leader was presented in the month of August. Just in the most intense moment of the summer travel season, almost 13,000 air traffic controllers left their jobs after the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) did not accept their labor demands.

Represented by the Organization of Professional Air Traffic Controllers (PATCO), that union created in 1968 had demanded an immediate increase of 10,000 dollars for each of its members, from salaries that three decades ago ranged between 20,000 and 49,000 dollars annual They also asked for better pensions and a reduction in working hours up to 32 hours of work per week. All these demands were 770 million dollars, compared to a counteroffer from the FAA of only 40 million dollars.

As a result of the strike that began on August 3, thousands of flights had to be canceled. Although for union frustration, the contingency plans worked. The government managed to resuscitate the air transport system with the help of 3,000 controllers with the category of supervisors, another 2,000 opposed to the strike and 900 military personnel. To the point of quickly achieving that 80% of passenger transport and almost all cargo flights could operate normally.

However, Reagan denounced as illegal the pulse of the controllers because of their status as public employees and raised an ultimatum: return to work within 48 hours or sudden termination. On August 5, the president complied with his warning and dismissed the more than 11,000 controllers who had ignored his orders. In addition, the federal Justice applied millionaire sanctions against the union of the controllers, chaired by Robert Poli, and the funds foreseen to prolong the strike were also blocked.

solmaris [256]4 years ago
7 0
  • <em>Americans believed that Reagan would take swift action if anyone challenged the government.</em>
You might be interested in
Who was Senator Robert Wagner, what was his relationship to the Taft-Hartley Act, and why did he oppose the act?
slega [8]
<span>Senator Robert Wagner was an American politician and a democratic U.S. Senator from New York from 1927 to 1949. He helped to pass the National Labor Relations Act, which greatly expanded the rights of labor workers by allowing them to organize into trade unions and bargain for better working conditions. The Taft-Hartley act is also known as the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, which amended the National Labor Relations Act to restrict the activities and power of labor unions. Since Robert Wagner worked immensely hard on the National Labor Relations Act, he did not approve of such restrictions from the Taft-Hartley Act.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How is a federal government typically created?
8_murik_8 [283]
Central and state governments agree to share power
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which leader did not promote the new nationalism of the "American System"?
kiruha [24]
It would be George Washington
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were supreme courts views on corporation rights in late 1880s
Tomtit [17]

Corporate personhood is the legal notion that a corporation, separately from its associated human beings (like owners, managers, or employees), has at least some of the legal rights and responsibilities enjoyed by natural persons (physical humans).[1] In the United States and most countries, corporations have a right to enter into contracts with other parties and to sue or be sued in court in the same way as natural persons or unincorporated associations of persons. In a U.S. historical context, the phrase 'Corporate Personhood' refers to the ongoing legal debate over the extent to which rights traditionally associated with natural persons should also be afforded to corporations. A headnote issued by the Court Reporter in the 1886 Supreme Court case Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Co. claimed to state the sense of the Court regarding the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as it applies to corporations, without the Court having actually made a decision or issued a written opinion on that point. This was the first time that the Supreme Court was reported to hold that the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause granted constitutional protections to corporations as well as to natural persons, although numerous other cases, since Dartmouth College v. Woodward in 1819, had recognized that corporations were entitled to some of the protections of the Constitution. In Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. (2014), the Court found that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 exempted Hobby Lobby from aspects of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act because those aspects placed a substantial burden on the closely held company's owners' exercise of free religion.[2]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_personhood


5 0
3 years ago
Political scientists often study why a political communication was created in
Bumek [7]

Answer:context

Explanation: they are

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why was communism more accepted in asia after WW1
    11·1 answer
  • What were the LAST two states admitted to the union and in what year(s) did they join?
    5·2 answers
  • -Pros and Cons of British Rule
    15·1 answer
  • Historically, how do Japan and China get along?
    14·2 answers
  • What other religions are the Aryans gods similar to?
    14·1 answer
  • What did McClellan do during the battle of Antitam that cost him a victory against lee?What were some of the mistakes he made
    9·1 answer
  • In referring to the deportations during the Armenian genocide, what does correspondent Henry Wood say was the “terrible feature
    8·2 answers
  • What is Periplus of the Erythraean Sea
    14·1 answer
  • Directions
    13·1 answer
  • • How did World War I affect European leaders' attitudes toward international aggression?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!