Answer: Concern for the less fortunate and people in Poverty
Concern for those forgotten or ignored society
Concern for social justice
Concern with the welfare of other women
Explanation:
In the early 1930s, as the nation slid toward the depths of depression, the future of organized labor seemed bleak. In 1933, the number of labor union members was around 3 million, compared to 5 million a decade before. Most union members in 1933 belonged to skilled craft unions, most of which were affiliated with the American Federation of Labor (AFL).
The union movement had failed in the previous 50 years to organize the much larger number of laborers in such mass production industries as steel, textiles, mining, and automobiles. These, rather than the skilled crafts, were to be the major growth industries of the first half of the 20th century.
Although the future of labor unions looked grim in 1933, their fortunes would soon change. The tremendous gains labor unions experienced in the 1930s resulted, in part, from the pro-union stance of the Roosevelt administration and from legislation enacted by Congress during the early New Deal. The National Industrial Recovery Act (1933) provided for collective bargaining. The 1935 National Labor Relations Act (also known as the Wagner Act) required businesses to bargain in good faith with any union supported by the majority of their employees. Meanwhile, the Congress of Industrial Organizations split from the AFL and became much more aggressive in organizing unskilled workers who had not been represented before. Strikes of various kinds became important organizing tools of the CIO.
Jonas was likely a A.) Federalist and a E.) supporter of James Madison. Federalism divided power among the various levels of government, promoting a weaker central government, which allows for a more capitalistic economic system, allowing Jonas to own his own private business. Because of this, it's clear that Jonas was likely a supporter of James Madison, a man who promoted federalism and helped to write The Federalist Papers.
They were beiing mean people.
Answer:
La identidad no es algo dado, no es fija. no es la suma de características sociales, psicológicas y/o culturales. ... Sin embargo, no se trata de un acto refejo sino de la construcción de un concepto de persona, cuyo contenido varía según la cultura (Giddens, 1997).
Explanation:
