The best option would be that "<span>The U.S. imposed a treaty that forced Latin American countries to democratize or face crippling sanctions," since it was never in American's best interest to force the democratization of the region. </span>
Answer:
Reason 1: Orleans is located in the Gulf of Mexico and is below sea level, where it is very vulnerable to hurricanes and other storms Reason 2: The levees, which keep water from flooding the city, were built to withstand a category 3 hurricane, but Katrina was a category 5 hurricane. Reason 3: The pumps in the levees had been damaged and earth walls stopped the water from draining out of the city.
Explanation:
Answer:
Awesome, I've been waiting for this
Explanation:
The Mississippi was used for transportation and their were ports along it before the LA purchase
One thing you have to be clear about is which war. I'm taking it to be WWI.
There was a cash crunch after WWI. France was not any kind of a problem with the United States. It's not B.
I better get to the point. It has to do with the fact that the United States couldn't sell an abundance of manufactured goods. A has to do with that, but it wasn't exactly a decline in the manufacturing industry. It was that she couldn't sell what she had in inventory.
Inflation didn't become a problem in a post WWI environment. In fact, the problem was deflation and unemployment in the 30s, but that is a decade away from this question.
This is one of those questions that a guess is as good as an answer. Britain didn't import which is the same thing as a trade imbalance. I would pick E but I think that D is very possible. They are both worded the wrong way.There was a drop off in American Exports. And Farm prices cratered. Does that mean that Americans were buying more British goods. It is not D if America couldn't sell anything to Britain.
That makes E true. I'd pick E, but there's lots of reasons to pick almost anything else except B.
