The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not have any further references or attachments, we can say that the sectional conflict was a combination of an irrepressible conflict with the work of bungling politicians, fanatics, and agitators.
Before the Civil War, there were many incidents, events, and decisions that create more separation in the views of the northerners and southerners. In the North, the idea of abolitionism was supported by most states, while in the South, slavery was an important part of the economy. Indeed, southern states depended on slaves to produce the crops in large plantations. These crops had to be exported to Europe.
The Missouri Compromise or the Kansas-Nebraska Act was the product of different points of view from legislators trying to fix things until the problems too many that made seven states seceded from the Union, and later, the beginning of the Civil War.
It’s number C i think i hope that helps!
There was different effects for it. I'm not sure if your question is free response or multiple choice but some effects were: widening the gap between the rich and poor, making inner cities have even worse conditions, the beatniks rose to counter the middle class lifestyle, schools in suburbs were better than the ones in inner cities
Answer:
Landowners grew more than cotton
Because the Ottoman Empire wanted more land. Also the Ottoman Empire lost the first war and when they do lost the war the give them land but no money
