Answer:
The correct option is B,zero monetary cost but a $1,000 per month opportunity cost
Explanation:
Monetary cost also known as explicit cost is the actual costs incurred in running a business.But the business in this case is renting of the property,frankly speaking, Jeane has not incurred any cost in her property business,hence monetary cost is zero.
Opportunity is the cost or benefits from alternative course of action. Jeane not renting out the property on commercial basis is the alternative course of action in this case.Since the commercial letting gives $1500 and the letting to her brother gives $500, the difference between the two rents is $1000 which is benefits forgone from letting the house to her brother,that is the opportunity cost.
The answer is: "job enrichment" .
_____________________________________________
<span> "Frederick Herzberg believed the best way to motivate employees with through his model of <u> job enrichment </u><u /> , which expands job content to create more opportunities for job satisfaction."
_____________________________________________</span>
Answer:
To evaluate the effectiveness of controls over all relevant financial statement disclosures in the financial statements.
Explanation:
In Accounting, an internal control is a mechanism, procedure, rule or policy designed by management to secure assets, promote efficiency, ensure accountability and prevent fraudulent behavior in an organization.
The main goal of auditing internal control is to evaluate the effectiveness of controls over all relevant financial statement disclosures in the financial statements.
Answer:
Variable overhead rate variance = $2,870 favorable
Explanation:
Variable overhead rate variance is the difference between the standard cost allowed for variable production overhead and the actual variable cost incurred.
This computed as follows:
$
17,130 hours should have cost ( 17,130 ×7.20) 123336
but did cost <u>120,466</u>
Variable overhead rate variance <u> 2870
</u> Favorable
Variable overhead rate variance = $2,870
Answer:
each policy will pay $25,000 of the loss
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that the each policy will pay $25,000 of the loss. This is an equal share for each policy and is due to them having the pro rata liability clause. This clause states that a policy is only liable for an equal percentage of the loss if the insurer has other policies from other companies. As in this case.
