Which statement best describes the relationship between the Industrial Revolution and the scientific revolution in Europe?

2 answers:

5 0

The Ind<span>ustrial Revolution began when people applied the principles of the scientific revolution to farming and manufacturing...apex

</span>

seropon [69]3 years ago

3 0

The correct answer is D. The Industrial Revolution began when people applied the principles of the scientific revolution to farming and manufacturing

Explanation:

The Scientific Revolution began in the 16th century and led to important discoveries and development related to certain scientific areas such as mathematics, biology, chemistry among others, these included the development of steam engines, new discoveries related to electricity and biology. Later, during the 18th and 19th century all those discoveries and developments were applied to farming and manufacturing, for example, the steam engine was applied to manufacturing while biology discoveries were used to improve farming, in this way the Industrial Revolution began in the 19th century. Thus, both revolutions are connected and thanks to the principles of the scientific revolution the industrial revolution was possible, especially when those discoveries were applied to farming and manufacturing.

You might be interested in

which of the following is a way farmers attempted to increase the price of agriculture products during the great depression?

BlackZzzverrR [31]

They did it by destroying their agriculture products

3 0

2 years ago

Please help ASAP

Amanda [17]

D) Fourteen Points Plan was proposed by Woodrow Wilson at the end of World War 1 to maintain Peace. This plan included the League of Nations

4 0

3 years ago

How did the seventeenth amendment to the u.S. Constitution give more political power to the individual voter?

Inessa [10]

17th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution: Direct Election of U.S. Senators (1913)

The Constitution, as it was adopted in 1788, made the Senate an assembly where the states would have equal representation. Each state legislature would elect two senators to 6-year terms. Late in the 19th century, some state legislatures deadlocked over the election of a senator when different parties controlled different houses, and Senate vacancies could last months or years. In other cases, special interests or political machines gained control over the state legislature. Progressive reformers dismissed individuals elected by such legislatures as puppets and the Senate as a "millionaire’s club" serving powerful private interests.

One Progressive response to these concerns was the "Oregon system," which utilized a state primary election to identify the voters’ choice for Senator while pledging all candidates for the state legislature to honor the primary’s result. Over half of the states adopted the "Oregon system," but the 1912 Senate investigation of bribery and corruption in the election of Illinois Senator William Lorimer indicated that only a constitutional amendment mandating the direct election of Senators by a state’s citizenry would allay public demands for reform.

When the House passed proposed amendments for the direct election of Senators in 1910 and 1911, they included a "race rider" meant to bar Federal intervention in cases of racial discrimination among voters. This would be done by vesting complete control of Senate elections in state governments. A substitute amendment by Senator Joseph L. Bristow of Kansas provided for the direct election of Senators without the "race rider." It was adopted by the Senate on a close vote before the proposed constitutional amendment itself passed the Senate. Over a year later, the House accepted the change, and on April 8, 1913, the resolution became the 17th amendment.

6 0

3 years ago

"Prithvi Narayan Shah was an expert and far sighted politician and successful administrator." Explain.

Serjik [45]

Answer:

PNS personally commanded many battles. The battles taught him how to handle complex situations and how he could come out victorious.

PNS focused on his goal and used all means (Saam, Daam, Danda, Bhed) for his campaign. As he fought battles, he understood why integrating the nearby kingdoms could be beneficial against the rising British hegemony in the region. He also realized that the diversity of Nepal could be exploited by British to divide the kingdom.

Explanation:

Prithvi Narayan Shah was not a strategist in the beginning. As soon as he became the king of Gorkha, he wanted to capture Nuwakot. In 1800 B.S., the first troop he sent under Biraj Thapa could not cross the Trishuli River. PNS, however, was not satisfied with the delay and sent another troop under Maheshwar Panta. The Gorkhali troop lost to the nature (Trishuli) as well the soldiers of Nuwakot.

After the loss, PNS became a military strategist. He went Benaras, brought some weapons and trained his soldiers so that they obey all commands without fear. He also developed the Marwat system for helping the soldier’s family if he died in a battle. He also used Yogis, the devotees of Gorakhnath, as spies.

He did not know how to use geography to strategical advantage before he himself led the Second Battle of Nuwakot in 1801 B.S. Had Kalu Pandey not found a way to divert huge number of Nuwakote soldiers, PNS could have died in the battle.

He had already understood politics, though. Before the Second Battle of Nuwakot, PNS had realized that the Chaubise Rajyas could be threat to his campaign and he might have to kill his kins in Kaski, Lamjung and Tanahun. To avoid the “sins”, he changed his gotra from Bhardwaj to Kasyap.

He also understood that Nepal (the then Kathmandu Valley—Kantipur, Patan, and Bhaktapur) would be against him as soon as he captured Nuwakot. So he kept a cordial relation with Ranjit Malla of Bhaktapur, who was also his Meet Baa (best friend’s father/father’s best friend)

PNS used the anarchy established by the Pradhans to make his brother Dal Mardan Shah the king of Patan from 1820–1822. When PNS attacked Kirtipur in 1822, Dal Mardan Shah did not oppose even though the Pradhans had urged him to do so. On Poush 3, 1822, PNS won the third battle of Kirtipur. Less than four years later, PNS was the king of Nepal.

PNS also understood how the people of Nepal Mandal lived. When he won the surrounding areas, he imposed a complete economic blockade which was one of the biggest reasons behind his victory over Kantipur, Patan and Bhaktapur.

Through treaties and diplomatic understandings, he was able to solve a lot of problems with the Chaubises and Baises, the British, the Tibetan and the Newas.

7 0

3 years ago

Why was the “golden age” of india important?

Fiesta28 [93]

It was important because it was marked by extensive discoveries and inventions in Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, Dialectic, Literature, Logic, Mathematics, Astronomy, Religion and Philosophy.

4 0

3 years ago