The correct answer is "D".
Government spending is critical for the creation of jobs in the country. As national projects like interstate roads and infrastructure normally involve great investments generate that create many vacant positions. This means more jobs for citizens and consumers in the country will eventually increase. This also means that there will be an increase in the GDP of the country which means that there will be more liquidity in the government in order to pay the debt.
Answer:
a person who is interested in history I think
The juice consisted of very many additives. <span />
In the past, many people considered that Religious leaders as the embodiment of the truth
So basically, Philosophical ideas that came out from them will always involved in 'a Greater power' which heavily influence the way of thinking from people during that time
hope this helps
Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
