1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vredina [299]
3 years ago
11

Which best describes how the information lobbyists provide to lawmakers is significant? A) Lobbyists are allowed to provide fals

e information to undermine opponents. B) Lobbyists have access to information that may not be available to others, even politicians. C) Lobbyists offer precise information on voter positions, which politicians can use in elections. D) Lobbyists can present information in a way that supports their clients’ positions.
History
2 answers:
valkas [14]3 years ago
7 0

i believe your answer is D.

Gelneren [198K]3 years ago
5 0

<u>What the lobbyists do: </u>

<em><u>Research issues </u></em>

• Build coalitions w/ other groups

• Develop strategy

• Meet with legislators & staff

• Attend/testify at committee hearings

• Negotiate with other legislators,

administration, etc.

• Campaign to build public pressure

<u><em>Lobbyists form an</em></u> “<u>extended staff</u>” <u><em>for Congress </em></u>

• <u><em>They provide all sorts of information</em></u>:

– Technical research on bills

– Political information on bills

– They write speeches

– They provide witnesses for hearings

– They organize legislative coalitions

– They provide info for constituents on MC’s behalf

• <u><em>Lobbyists provide info to Congress</em></u>

• <u><em>Lobbyists also provide info to clients</em></u>

  – What Congress or agencies are doing

• <u><em>Lobbyists may act as negotiators</em></u>

  – They are diplomats trying to win the best deal

<u>The answer that comes closest is B</u>: <u><em>Lobbyists have access to information that may not be available to others, including politicians</em></u>.

You might be interested in
What is the main reason that the US government wanted to avoid large-scale railroad strikes after the Great Railroad Strike of 1
ZanzabumX [31]
The main reason that the government of the United States wanted to avoid a large-scale railroad strike from recurring after the Great Railroad Strike of 1877, was because politicians realized how strikers were going to go through any means to have their voice heard to stop the corporations from taking over. This also caused a huge economic crisis, as many cities having huge amounts of losses in property damage. Because of this scare after the strike, many unions became better organized, however leaders became more rigid with labor, possibly because they were frightened of another great strike. However, this only motivated the union and the labor movement more to fight for what they believed was right.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Teapot Dome scandal involved: a. the attorney general, who took bribes not to prosecute accused criminals. b. Herbert Hoover
s2008m [1.1K]

Answer:

Option: d. the secretary of the interior, who received money in exchange for leasing government oil reserves to private companies.

Explanation:

The Teapot Dome scandal appeared in America in the 1920s when Albert Fall, Secretary of the Interior,  was accused of taking bribes from fuel companies ( Harry F. Sinclair. and Edward L. Doheny) in exchange for permissions to drill on federal land for oil. The scandal shocked the American people because it exposed corruption and greed present in the government.

8 0
3 years ago
Why might television and newspaper advertisements be incomplete sources of information about candidates?
Degger [83]

Answer:

D-they show bias toward the promoted candidate

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
In 1812 napoleons was involved in the
enyata [817]

Answer:

In 1812 , Napoleon was involved in the PENINSULAR WAR . He had succeeded in gaining control over states such as SPAIN and PORTUGAL .

<em>hope</em><em> </em><em>this</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em>nswers</em><em> </em><em>correct</em><em> </em><em>:</em><em>)</em>

4 0
3 years ago
Paragraph proving Rome has a strong empire
noname [10]

Answer:

You can't "prove" it was a strong empire, but you can provide evidence. As you can see below, just some points that will make it evident.

Explanation:

"<em>The Roman Empire, among the most well known in the ancient world, lasted for nearly a thousand years. Conquering peoples of the Greek Peninsula, countless Britannic Tribes, and overthrowing the great Carthaginians are among a few of the incredible accolades of the Romans. Of course, this could not have been done without the mighty Roman Army which evolved over centuries of trials and error. The Roman Army was feared not only because of its technological advantage over others, but because of its intense discipline and flexibility. It was this aspect of the Romans that made their "Legions" a force to be reckon with. For this reason alone, one might argue that the Roman's had one of the strongest Empires at the time of their existence." </em>

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What does Portia compare a rumor to?
    12·2 answers
  • Which underlying theme of the work is evident in this passage from The Adventures of Tom Sawyer by Mark Twain? Tom was a glitter
    5·2 answers
  • Which of these terms describe the agreement between Abraham and god that forms the foundation of the Jewish religion.
    12·1 answer
  • Paul Revere displayed civic virtue by - *
    5·1 answer
  • Why was the Battle of Saratoga so important in the War of Independence?
    9·2 answers
  • Which views did the Federalists favor?
    14·2 answers
  • 1. The free enterprise system is helpful because it allows for freedom.
    8·2 answers
  • I need an answer! NO LINKS PLS!
    14·1 answer
  • In the product 6O2, what does the coefficient mean?
    6·2 answers
  • What were specific limits placed upon the government by the English Bill of Rights?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!