The question is not properly organised and is asking what the following action means, see below proper sequence:
1. A candidate recalling all the good things he has done, and omitting facts that would justify his defeat debating team is called (…).
2. Giving the impression that everyone is involved so the listener would feel the "danger" of missing out is (…).
3. An organized group that competes with others in the art of debate is (…).
4. Without any danger of error; basing actions on the truth is (…).
5. To inform and make known the opinions and feelings of oneself is (…).
Answer:
1. card-stacking
2. bandwagon
3. a debating Team
4. factually
5. propagandizing
Answer:
Explanation:
NASSA rules are set of laws enacted to guide the administration of business and trading activities. Some of the NASAA are protection of vulnerable adults from financial exploitation and guides against unethical practices by investment advisers.
NASSA rules does not forbid RIA from charging an incentive fee based on investment performance, however , it must be able to prove that the fee charged is fair , reasonable and affordable by the customer , in as much as the customer is not being financially exploited.
Answer:
D: The accept/reject decision depends on the firm's risk-adjustment policy. If Norris' policy is to increase the required return on a riskier-than average project to 3% over rs, then it should reject the project
Explanation:
Please refer the complete question:
Which of the following statements is correct?
a. The project should definitely be accepted because its expected return (before any risk adjustments) is greater than its required return.
b. The project should definitely be rejected because its expected return (before risk adjustment) is less than its required return.
c. Riskier-than-average projects should have their expected returns increased to reflect their higher risk. Clearly, this would make the project acceptable regardless of the amount of the adjustment.
d. The accept/reject decision depends on the firm's risk-adjustment policy. If Norris' policy is to increase the required return on a riskier-than-average project to 3% over rS, then it should reject the project.
e. Capital budgeting projects should be evaluated solely on the basis of their total risk. Thus, insufficient information has been provided to make the accept/reject decision.
