1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ronch [10]
3 years ago
11

Which describes what the Missouri Compromise (Compromise of 1820) and the Compromise of 1850 had in common?

History
2 answers:
GalinKa [24]3 years ago
8 0
One thing that the Missouri Compromise (Compromise of 1820) and the Compromise of 1850 had in common was that "<span>They both attempted to preserve the Union," since the only other option regarding the slavery issue was civil war. </span>
otez555 [7]3 years ago
6 0
The answer is A. i am sorry if it is wrong 
You might be interested in
How did some Florentines respond to Savonarola’s ideas, sermons, and accusations?
mote1985 [20]
<span>They didnt think he was the best, so they held him in jail.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Which action is most closely associated with the Anti-Federalists' goals?
expeople1 [14]
It would be the action of "A) opposing ratifying the Constitution" that was most closely associated with the Anti-Federalists' goals, since they thought the Constitution would give the new government far too much power over the states. 
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
List 2 problems with the Treaty of Versailles?
Inga [223]

<u>Note: Please paraphrase</u>

Answer:

The Treaty of Versailles was flawed in many ways as it put the complete blame of the War on Germany. Germany was forced to pay heavy reparations, lost its colonies, and forced to reduce its army. It was doomed from the start, and another war was practically certain.” The principle reasons for the failure of the Treaty of Versailles to establish a long-term peace include the following: 1) the Allies disagreed on how best to treat Germany; 2) Germany refused to accept the terms of reparations; and 3) Germany’s refusal to accept the “war-guilt” led to growing German resentment and nationalism.

4 0
3 years ago
How has America supported immigration ?
IrinaVladis [17]

Answer:

According to the National Academy of Sciences, “immigration is integral to the nation’s economic growth.” That is partially because the U.S. workforce is getting older, which makes the arrival of tax-paying, job-creating, and business-starting newcomers an economic necessity. The report also found that there is “little evidence that immigration significantly affects the overall employment levels of native-born workers.”In fact, IRS data from 2015 shows that the agency received 4.4 million income tax returns from workers without Social Security numbers—who are more likely to be undocumented—which were worth $23.6 billion [PDF].What’s the difference between a refugee, asylum seeker, migrant, and immigrant?

The terms “asylum seeker,” “immigrant,” “migrant,” and “refugee” are often used interchangeably. The differences between the four, however, are important.

According to the International Rescue Committee:

Refugees are people living outside of the United States who were “forced to flee [their] home because of war, violence, or persecution, often without warning.”

Asylum seekers are people who are “seeking international protection from dangers in [their] home country, but whose claim for refugee status hasn’t been determined legally.” People seeking asylum are applying inside the United States. Whether a person is seeking asylum or status as a refugee, they have to meet the same challenging burden of proof. They must demonstrate “a well-founded fear of persecution” on the basis of race, religion, national origin, political opinion, or member of a social group.

Migrants are people who are “moving from place to place (within [their] country or across borders), usually for economic reasons such as seasonal work.”

Immigrants are people who have made “a conscious decision to leave his or her home and move to a foreign country with the intention of settling there.”

Explanation:

(happy to help)

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Last Question Please Help me! Thanks you so much :D
Vilka [71]
D. <span>A primary source is written by someone who saw the event, but a secondary source is not.
</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What would happen if the constitution was never written?
    5·1 answer
  • What was John Wilkes booth legacy
    14·2 answers
  • This isn't really a question, but I need more information for my report on Anne Frank. I need to know any important stuff on her
    7·1 answer
  • Was the capital built partly by slaves
    6·2 answers
  • My friends keep mentioning this thing called "stewie" what is a stewie
    6·1 answer
  • In what way are the modern Greeks people similar to the ancient Greeks of the past
    7·1 answer
  • What is the differentiate of komedya from bodabil?​
    10·2 answers
  • Hey does azzyland have a acount on brainly
    5·1 answer
  • Which leader stepped down after holding and losing a plebiscite asking the Chilean people whether they wanted him to continue in
    12·1 answer
  • The Wagner Act guaranteed employers the right to fire workers that tried to join unions.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!