3 years ago

Please answer quick!!!

1 answer:

3 0

This is obviously a decreasing sequence. Thus, the common ratio is the fraction 1/4, not the integer 4. Eliminate C and D. Next, at n=1, the value of the 1st term is 16, which is actually 16(1/4)^(1-1) = 16(1) = 16. Thus, B is correct.

You might be interested in

Write an inequality that represents eight less than 3 times a number is more than 22

SCORPION-xisa [38]

Answer:

3x-8>22

Step-by-step explanation:

3 times a number = 3x

8 less = -8

more than 22 = >22

Put them together and you get:

3x-8>22

8 0

2 years ago

Thanks to all those who support my question!

Mazyrski [523]

Answer:

no, because intergers are negative. they will never be able to be greater

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the opposite of the number -2 1/3 ?

Katyanochek1 [597]

The opposite of the number -2 1/3 is 2 1/3 because if you look at a number line you will see that -2 1/3 and 2 1/3 are on opposite sides of the line

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Please help i'm so confused

umka21 [38]

Answer:

if it's bot raining, then it's sunny

8 0

2 years ago

Amanda and Stephen wrote the following proofs to prove that vertical angles are congruent. Who is correct? Line segment NT inter

jolli1 [7]

In fact, both Amanda's and Stephen's profs are correct; they are just using different supplementary angles. Amanda's is using the supplementary angles ∠1 and ∠4, and ∠3 and ∠4, whereas Stephen is using ∠1 and ∠2, and ∠2 and ∠3. Please check the picture to visualize this more effectively.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers