One reason was that at the time the communication between the states took more time and the states needed "representatives" to vote; since people couldn't reasonably vote in person.
Another reason was that they believed that the people can be manipulated, and the Electors would be more educated, so less prone to manipulation.
Answer:
The description of the discussion would be summarized below.
Explanation:
- Humans can't honestly say that somehow deliberately choosing an employee who doesn't even have the most professional experience than everyone else seems to be unconstitutional. A few other individuals are somewhat more capable of working due to various their possibility, and maybe some recruitment agencies always want to nominate employees from about there possibilities rather than from about their observation. The experience could become a further advantage.
- After that, throughout today's particular instance, American and Russian applicants seemed to have more employment stability and technical suggestions than those of the Chinese lady. However, the availability had been in pursuit including its Chinese lady. Perhaps the Chinese woman seems to have more possibility than any of the other young women. Perhaps she has the same opportunities to succeed in current concepts.
- Throughout this modern generation of creativity, employers have been trying to give considerable priority to potential. It would be very necessary to choose the best candidate from some kind of range of applicants with the appropriate credentials and skills.
Enough that, throughout our specific instance, this same Chinese lady would have less professional experience and fewer guidelines, but she will have much more possibility than all of the other young women, and maybe that's the explanation why she would be chosen.
The definition of orthodox is someone or something that strictly adheres to religious beliefs or the conventional
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
This would be my letter.
Dear Sirs,
As the head of the Civilian Institute of the Environment, I would like to express my concern for the recent announcement of the construction of a mall 20ft at the edge of the coast.
My first concern is that a type of construction that size could have a negative impact on the beauty of the landscape of our town. This is a typical American town with classic buildings. A modern building like the one you showed in your project, could negatively impact our traditional landscape.
Furthermore, there is a technical concern that I would like you to answer and elaborate. The issue of coastal erosion could affect the foundation and the construction materials of the mall. With the pass of time, this will be a major risk in the security of the building.
That is why, on behalf of the members of our institution, would like to have a meeting to discuss these issues and solve many doubts that the citizens of this town have.
Thank you very much for your attention. I'll wait for your answer.
Sincerely,