Social activists work to promote, guide, or impede changes in government or business policies and influence the actions of individuals and groups. They build connections among groups and communities and disseminate information on specific issues to create awareness and influence social change.
<h3>What is
Social activists?</h3>
According to the Oxford Dictionary, a social activist is "a person who works to achieve political or social change, especially as a member of an organization with specific goals."
Racial equality, gender equality, immigration reform, human rights, LGBTQ+ rights, and religious freedom are all popular social movements among activists. Environmental activism and computer activism are two other types of activism (or hacktivism).
Activism has played a significant role in the abolition of slavery, the challenge of dictatorships, the protection of workers from exploitation, the protection of the environment, the promotion of gender equality, the opposition to racism, and many other important issues. Activism can also be used to target minorities or to promote war.
To know more about Social activists follow the link:
brainly.com/question/509532
#SPJ4
<span>Voters should be informed of all the active and political process because any mistakes on the vote lead to chaos. When voters are informed about the issues and goals of candidates they can decide who fits their ideal leader.
Example- I voted for the first time last year and had no idea who to vote for. The only person i knew not to vote for congress.</span>
Hello there!
President Andrew Jackson, nicknamed "Indian killer" or "sharp knife", was one of our "most racist" presidents. He killed many Indians, and disliked anyone apart from his race; white.
<span>President Andrew Jackson said that “this is a country for white men”, meaning he obviously disliked anyone of color.
Hope this helps you!
~DL
</span>
Answer:
Explanait should matter a lottion: America being a democracy means that it has freedom, freedom of speech is very applied and citizen participation is the most important thing inn this democracy and citizen participation is a curtail thing
Answer and Explanation:
Kant's principle of universalizability suggests that we do what we feel should be generalised or in his words universalised. I'm there words for something to be considered morally valid it should be generally satisfactory and not just apply to one person
On the other hand his principle of humanity suggests that we do those things that treat each human being as though he is the end not the means. In other words, we do not consider another human being to be something that could be used to achieve another thing but the sole purpose or end for which anything is done
The above do have contradictory applications since by generalizing a thing we could still be using a human being and not making him the end in this respect. I believe the best of the two principles however is the humanity principle since by holding this principle dear every human being would treat each other better and the universalizability principle would still apply.
