Answer:
for sure, person B wouldn't be charged with murder
Explanation:
because person B was basically forced to do it by person A, the charge would prolly go to person A
Answer:
A
Explanation:
I would want to believe A, Ginsburg was a women's rights champion and the court's second female justice., is the answer because it explains more about the person in question, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, that is.
While the other options were more about what she said or did, A in particular is talking about who Ruth is, and even went as much as listing an accolade of hers, that she's the court's second female justice.
So, I go with A
Answer:
necesitas
Explanation:
necesitas tú algo de la tienda?
me parece que es la respuesta indicada
Answer:
Brown v. Entertainment in 2011
Explanation:
Answer:
The legal school of thought illustrated in this dialogue is:
Law and economics school of thought.
Explanation:
The law and economics school of thought postulates that economic analyses, theories, and methods should be brought to the practice and interpretation of laws. This means that the tools of economic reasoning are the best tools for justified and consistent legal practices. This school of thought is significantly one of the dominant theories of jurisprudence.
