1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dezoksy [38]
4 years ago
13

What reasons and evidence does the author use in support of the argument? Check all that apply. Law enforcement used new technol

ogy to identify Pearl’s killers. Law enforcement used old-fashioned technology to find Pearl’s killers. The act enables law enforcement to fight a new war with high-tech means. The act enables law enforcement to fight new threats with antique means. The act allows police to use advanced technology to locate suspects.
Law
2 answers:
Romashka [77]4 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Law enforcement used new technology to identify Pearl’s killers.

The act enables law enforcement to fight a new war with high-tech means.

The act allows police to use advanced technology to locate suspects.

Explanation:

Darina [25.2K]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

1 3 5

Explanation:

got it right on edgen2020

You might be interested in
I have two questions please answer.
ira [324]

Answerl

La familia es un grupo de personas formado por individuos unidos

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What is the original position?
zavuch27 [327]
Do you have a better picture?
8 0
3 years ago
LUPE was in the grocery store and was having trouble controlling her wild 4-year-old son MIGUELITO. She told him twice to settle
Simora [160]

Nonaccidental physical injuries children suffer at the hands of their parents occur along a continuum that ranges from mild to severe. At the outer edges of this continuum, one might find, on the one hand, a slight swat to the buttocks, and on the other, a brutal beating. In the United States, the normative consensus appears to be that outsiders to the family are appropriately concerned only when the physical injury at issue causes serious harm; any injury short of a serious one is exclusively “family business.”Consistent with this consensus, all states’ laws permit the use of “reasonable” corporal punishment; simultaneously, they all prohibit non accidentally inflicted serious injury. The latter is generally denominated abuse, although some states classify milder but still impermissible injuries as neglect, or simply “inappropriate discipline.” Thus, being able to distinguish between reasonable corporal punishment and maltreatment—whether this is formally denominated abuse or neglect—is critical for the relevant actors: parents who use corporal punishment as a disciplinary tool, child protective services (CPS) staff who are required by statute to intervene in the family to protect children subject to or at risk of abuse, and courts adjudicating issues arising in connection with these cases. The integrity of the distinction and of the methodology employed to make it is also critical for a society that is prominently committed to both family autonomy and child welfare, and in particular to protecting the integrity of the family when it promotes (or at least does not harm) child welfare, and to intervening in the family when it fails in its related obligations.Unfortunately, few if any states have sufficiently defined the relevant terms “reasonable corporal punishment” or “maltreatment” (abuse or neglect) to consistently guide the relevant actors (those in a single system) in their exercises of discretion; nor have they established a coherent methodology for sorting injuries along the continuum of nonaccidental physical injuries. That administrative regulations and policies promulgated by state and local CPS departments often narrow agency discretion helps CPS itself to be more consistent and may help families know what to expect when they are dealing with CPS. But because appellate courts do not appear to give much deference to agency interpretations of the statutory definitions, these regulations and policies do little to guide the courts’ own exercise of discretion. Moreover, to the extent that the law in statutes and judicial opinions is either less precise or even different from the law as it is applied by CPS, the public and parents are inevitably confused or misled. As a result, decisionmaking about whether an injury or incident remains in the realm of family business or has crossed the line into the impermissible varies, reflecting a multiplicity of purely personal viewpoints, religious and political ideologies, and academic or disciplinary training and requirements. In turn, institutional treatment of and outcomes for children and families are often inconsistent. The status quo has been defended or at least explained on several grounds. The vagueness of abuse definitions has been consistently upheld on policy grounds—specifically on the argument that it is important for authorities to retain flexibility to call injuries as they see them given that, particularly in a diverse society, abuse might appear in unexpected forms.

4 0
3 years ago
24. What is the current in a circuit if the charges passing each point is
stepladder [879]

Answer:

ghfjdksaghfjdksagfhdjskaghfdjksa

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Within how many days of acquiring or discovering a significant financial interest is the investigator required to submit an upda
Alex

Answer:

Within 30 days.

Explanation:

Investigators are required to disclose all significant financial interests connected with their institutional responsibilities. If investigators acquire or discover any new significant financial interest (for instance, through marriage, purchase or acquisition or inheritance), they must submit an updated disclosure to the institution they work for. The new disclosure shall include information that has not been provided before to the institution.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • I Really need your help!!please im in need
    8·1 answer
  • Is the grandfather clause still in effect for tobacco
    6·1 answer
  • When someone pleads insanity, what two things must they submit to the court?
    14·2 answers
  • Real question. im a legally able to label as a woman if i have a beard?
    7·2 answers
  • Opposing sides of a bill will do which of the following, which means giving arguments for or against a bill?
    13·2 answers
  • What is the M'Naghten Rule? How did this rule come into existence?<br><br> Criminology?
    13·1 answer
  • What is the main theme of surah ikhalas​
    13·1 answer
  • Match the statements with the governmental entities. Answers may be used more than once.
    6·1 answer
  • Although the United States was founded on freedom, the original law stipulated that to be able to have a vote, a person must not
    8·1 answer
  • On what ground, does Thomas Hobbes prefer a country contract an absolute monarch as the best ruler? [7 marks]​
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!