All categories

3 years ago

Asking your supervisor if you're doing something correctly is a way to request what?

Business

2 answers:

lbvjy [14]3 years ago

7 0

Asking your supervisor if you're doing something correctly is a way to request feedback
hope this is what you needed

balandron [24]3 years ago

7 0

Asking your supervisor if you're doing something correctly is a way to request

~FEEDBACK~

You might be interested in

Anna is willing to spend $500 for the bike she wants. if she finds a bike store where the price of the bike she wants is only $4

muminat

The answer is $100. The consumer surplus is $100 because that is the difference between what Anna has set as her ceiling for the purchase of the bicycle, $500, and then subtracted by the amount that she actually does pay, $400, that difference is what is referred to as consumer surplus. What the consumer is mentally committed to paying minus what the consumer actually pays.

8 0

3 years ago

With the emergence of smartphones, users no longer have to carry a separate music player, a video game, a laptop, or a magazine

ohaa [14]

Answer: (D) Industry convergence

Explanation:

The industry convergence is basically representing the fundamental growth in an organization and it basically helps in defining the various types of industries boundaries according to the business principle.

The industry convergence is the way for applying the knowledge by using the various types of technology related application in the industry.

According to the given question, the emergence of the smartphones industry with the different types of given application best illustrating the industry convergence concept.

Therefore, Option (D) is correct answer.

6 0

3 years ago

You wish to earn a return of 13% on each of two stocks, X and Y. Stock X is expected to pay a dividend of $3 in the upcoming yea

Otrada [13]

Answer: D. will be less than the intrinsic value of stock Y

Explanation:

Based on the information given above, the intrinsic value of Stock X will be calculated thus:

D1 = Dividend in next year = $3

g = growth rate = 7%

r = = 13%

Therefore, intrinsic value of Stock X will be:

= D1 / (r-g)

= 3 / (13% - 7%)

= 3/6%

= 3 / 0.06

= $50

Therefore, the intrinsic value of stock X is $50.

Intrinsic value of Stock Y will b calculated thus:

D1 = $4

g = 7%

r = 13%

Intrinsic value of Stock Y will be:

= D1 / (r-g)

= 4 / (13% - 7%)

= 4/6%

= 4 / 0.06

= 66.67

Intrinsic value of Stock Y is $66.67

Therefore, the intrinsic value of Stock X will be less than the intrinsic value of Stock Y

8 0

3 years ago

Suppose the required reserve ratio is 20 percent, and the Fed buys $1 million worth of bonds from the public. If the public depo

777dan777 [17]

Answer:

Increase directly by $1 million and an additional lending capacity of $4 million will be created for the banking system.

Explanation:

The formula for increase in money supply is

Increase in money supply = (1 / Required reserve ratio) * Excess reserve.

Now, we have, required reserve ratio of 20%.

That means, out of $1 million deposit, required reserve = ($1,000,000 * 0.20) = $200,000.

Now, we knew that, Total reserve = required reserve + excess reserve

Total Reserve = $1,000,000 and required reserve = $200,000.

So, Excess reserve = $1,000,000 - $200,000 = $800,000.

Now, Increase in money supply = (1 / 0.20) * $800,000 = $4 million.

That means,

If the public deposits this amount into transactions accounts, the money supply will:

Increase directly by $1 million and an additional lending capacity of $4 million will be created for the banking system.

7 0

3 years ago

A division of Frank Clothiers had 36 openings for assistant store manager last year. As part of their voluntary affirmative acti

statuscvo [17]

Answer:

Explanation:

Yes, Disparate Impact Theory can be used in this case relating to the processes of subjective selection such as interrogations. If a discriminatory workplace practice has an unfair and aggressive impact on minorities, it may be in violation of Title VII. Professional individual employees who support on the basis of discretionary judgments without intending to do so are engaging in biased conduct.

The case of Watson V. Fort Worth Bank & Trust will be used to support my claim. Clara Watson turned down a promotion that was contingent on an interview under this scenario.

The U.s. Supreme Court Declared that a Title VII claim to a strategy of subjection enforcement can only be investigated under the unequal care principle. In the majority decision, the Court allowed the principle of (disparate effects) to apply to arbitrarily defined work practices.

4 0

3 years ago