Answer:
True.
Explanation:
An author provides a variety of information through different sources in his/her work not only to substantiate or establish the credibility of his/her claim but also to propose a clear and effective understanding to the readers. This variety of information may include facts, quotations, statistics, etc. which could have been taken from a book, a journal, newspaper article, etc.
Citation is one of the crucial elements of literary writing not only to avoid plagiarism but also to validate the authenticity and originality of the work.
As per the question, the given assertion would be categorized as true as the information sharing common knowledge or general facts need not be cited due to the availability of such information in a number of sources. <u>For example; 'Shakespeare is one of the greatest writers of the English language in general and drama in particular' which is commonly known by almost everyone and can be found in various sources.</u> Thus, it is suggested that such information is not required to be cited. Therefore, the statement would be<u> true.</u>
1. Despite what is depicted in popular culture, Frankenstein is the name of the creature's creator.
2. The Italian physician Luigi Galvani demonstrated that nerve impulses have an electrical basis. He is also widely known as the father of bioelectromagnetics.
3. The stranger ask Robert Walton where the ship is headed before boarding the ship.
Answer:
Past perfect tense.
Explanation:
Supposing that the italicized verb is <u><em>had gone</em></u>, then the tense is past perfect tense.
This past perfect tense is an action that has happened sometime in the past but before something new has happened. In the sentence, the word "gone" is the third form of the verb, thus making it a past tense. Then, the use of the word "had" which is the past tense form of the verb "to have" shows it is the "perfect" form of the verb.
Thus, the whole sentence "<em>Your sister had gone when we arrived.</em>" is in the "past perfect tense".
She really enjoyed and felt a connection towards a future with brethren
Answer:
The answer is hyperbole. It is very unlikely that there was absolutely no money, absolutely nothing to buy, and absolutely nowhere to go. A hyperbole is a gross exaggeration, meaning that what is being said has been expanded to prove a point.