Bruh really?? Don't do that xD
By inference, the way in which Zaroff is portrayed as Rainsford’s foil is that: "Zaroff is a person without a conscience, but Rainsford has one." (Option B)
<h3>What is the explanation for the above inference?</h3>
As evidenced by the excerpt, Zaroff is not opposed to murdering others, which he regards as a form of hunting.
He has no regard for human life and is unconcerned whether they live or die, which distinguishes his character from Rainsford's.
Learn more about inference at;
brainly.com/question/25913650
#SPJ1
In Shakespeare's<span> Macbeth, the </span>porter<span> scene that comes after the killing of Duncan makes the reader laugh. The </span>porter<span> is a strange gatekeeper. </span>
Answer:
The authors claim in the passage is that sugar is different from honey. The authors primary purpose in the passage is that sugar is not as good as honey. The author uses interesting diction to get his point across about what he thinks of sugar and honey when in comparison.
Explanation:
