In Furman v. Georgia (1972), William Furman appealed his death sentence for a murder he committed during a burglary against him. He claimed that the state of Georgia did not respect the American constitution by sentencing him to death in this case. The US Supreme Court agreed to study this particular case and finally decided that he was right, in a document of more than 200 pages.
<h3>Further explanation</h3>
Five judges had met to deal with this issue. Three of them declared that it was against the constitution to sentence to death a man who killed someone but in particular circumstances. They explained that the death penalty could not be something that could apply in every case, every situation should be studied carefully not to commit injustice considering the importance and the cruelty of this sentence.
This decision, called 'Furman v. Georgia', did not mean the complete prohibition of the death penalty in complicated cases, but calls on states to create detailed laws and clear texts to know the exact terms of its application. Finally, this demand forced the states to harden their laws about the death penalty so they would not face the same kind of difficulties as in the Furman case.
<h3>Learn more</h3>
- The New Jersey Plan: brainly.com/question/5956921
- The fifth amendment: brainly.com/question/1487419
- The US congress: brainly.com/question/3217978
<h3>Answer details</h3>
Grade: 12
Subject: History
Chapter: The Constitution of the United States of America
Keywords: The US constitution, the death penalty, William Furman, a summary of Furman v. Georgia, Furman v. Georgia (1972), Furman v. Georgia case, Furman v. Georgia facts, Furman v. Georgia death penalty
